Interview

Honorable Ghali Mustapha Tijani Rejects Tax Reform Bills, Calls Them Anti-Masses

Published

on

Hon. Ghali Mustapha Tijani

House of Representatives member Dr. Ghali Mustapha Tijani, representing the Albasu/Gaya/Ajingi federal constituency of Kano State, has voiced his opposition to the Tax Reform Bills, describing them as anti-masses and capitalistic

Excerpts from the interview:

What’s your take on the tax reform bills being deliberated by the House?

Well, this is a national issue currently under discussion, though it has yet to be fully debated in the National Assembly or the House of Representatives. We know it has gone through its first reading, and this is the second reading. We also understand it is an Executive Bill.

Many members, including myself, have opinions on it. I took time to review the four bills thoroughly to understand their implications. With my background in finance, particularly as a student of International Corporate Finance, I can say with confidence that these bills are not in the public interest. They are not pro-masses; they are capitalist bills. As such, I, Dr. Ghali Mustapha Tijani, reject them. I am in Parliament to ensure my people are well represented and that Nigerians receive the dividends of democracy. These tax reform bills, however, are designed to burden the poor.

When you say the bills are anti-masses and capitalistic, can you elaborate?

This approach represents lazy thinking. Nigeria has many untapped opportunities for generating revenue. For instance, our mineral resources sector has not been adequately developed. If the government is serious about revenue generation, it should invest in mining and other resource-based sectors.

Moreover, Nigeria loses a significant amount of money through tax evasion and transfer pricing manipulation. Instead of creating new taxes, the government should focus on plugging these leakages. Taxing more people or companies will ultimately harm the economy by discouraging investment and job creation.

Some believe the tax reform bills are targeted at the North. Do you agree?
There are sentiments that suggest so, but I believe the crafters of this bill failed to understand Nigeria’s diverse economic structure. The bill was crafted with a narrow perspective and does not reflect the realities of the Nigerian economy.

The Northern Governors Forum has already expressed opposition to the bill. If this reform were beneficial to their states, they would have supported it. Their rejection shows it is not in their people’s best interest. I align with their stance.

You mentioned the Nigerian Governors Forum several times. Can you clarify their role?

The Nigerian Governors Forum, and specifically the Northern Governors Forum, understands the intricacies of our economy. They meet regularly to discuss the allocation of resources and have firsthand knowledge of the tax system. Their rejection of these bills underscores the fact that the bills are not in Nigeria’s best interest.

Do you believe the current tax regime needs reform at all?

No system is perfect, but those advocating for these bills have not provided any concrete evidence showing the current system’s failure. They have not conducted the necessary impact assessments. Reform should only be considered if there is clear evidence of systemic failure.

Furthermore, the proposed increase in VAT, from 7.5% to 15% by 2030, is alarming. It will undoubtedly affect the final consumer, especially since there is no effective mechanism to exempt low-income earners from the tax burden.

There are concerns that tax evasion is prevalent in the North. What’s your response?

Tax evasion is not a regional issue but a governance issue. It is the government’s responsibility to secure the borders and prevent tax leakages. The assumption that the North is evading taxes is unfounded.

Lagos, for example, benefits from its port, but the economic activities there involve all Nigerians—Northerners, Southerners, and others. Lagos was built by all Nigerians, and investment there reflects national contributions.

Are you under any pressure from Northern elites or the Presidency regarding your stance on the bill?

No one is pressuring me. I have a strong background in the private sector, and I base my decisions on intellectual analysis. This is my personal stance, and it is informed by my desire to protect the interests of the Nigerian people.

Do you believe the tax reform bills should be entirely discarded?
Yes, these bills should be set aside. The government should focus on critical issues like job creation, healthcare, education, and security. Implementing these tax reforms now will only worsen the current economic hardship. The government should consider granting tax holidays to small and medium-sized businesses to stimulate growth and create jobs.

 

What is your response to Davido’s comment about the economy being in shambles?

I agree with Davido. The economy is indeed in a dire state. Inflation is high, and government policies are not addressing the core issues. The focus should be on blocking revenue leakages, investing in mineral resources, and supporting small businesses to boost employment.

In summary, these tax reform bills are poorly timed and poorly conceived. The government should prioritize stabilizing the economy and addressing the urgent needs of Nigerians rather than imposing additional taxes that will exacerbate the current hardship.

 

Click to comment

Trending

Exit mobile version