Close Menu
National Update
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    National UpdateNational Update
    • News
    • Politics
    • Opinion
    • Economy
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Security
    National Update
    Home»News

    Mambilla Trial: Fresh Doubts Emerge After EFCC Witness Revises Testimony

    adminBy adminJuly 3, 2026Updated:July 3, 2026 News No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Fresh questions surfaced over the prosecution’s documentary evidence in the Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project trial on Thursday after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) fifth witness gave testimony that drew sharp objections from the defence over inconsistencies surrounding key Federal Executive Council (FEC) documents.
    The witness, Barrister John Illya Iyakwari, an Assistant Director (Legal) at the Federal Ministry of Power, admitted before the FCT High Court in Apo, Abuja, that he prepared an extract of the FEC minutes tendered by the EFCC without first sighting the original minutes.
    He also corrected his earlier testimony, telling the court that although he had initially claimed to have certified the document in June 2023, the certification was in fact carried out seven months later, in January 2024.
    Iyakwari further disclosed that the document was returned to him by an EFCC official, Umar Babangida, for certification and that he endorsed it as a true copy without comparing it with the original FEC minutes or determining whether it had been altered while in the commission’s custody.
    Proceedings took another dramatic turn when the witness was confronted with two versions of the FEC extract admitted as Exhibits 3D and 3K. During cross-examination, he told the court the documents were “different in form and substance.”
    But during re-examination on Thursday, Iyakwari appeared to depart from that position, stating that the two exhibits were “the same verbatim” in relevant respects.
    The defence immediately objected, arguing that the prosecution was attempting to remedy contradictions exposed during cross-examination through re-examination, an approach it said was inconsistent with the provisions of the Evidence Act.
    Although the trial judge overruled the objection, he held that the defence was at liberty to raise the issue during its final address.
    With the witness discharged, the prosecution informed the court that it would call its sixth witness when the matter resumes on Monday, July 6.
    Dr. Agunloye is facing trial over the 2003 award of the Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project under a Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) arrangement. He has consistently denied the allegations against him and pleaded not guilty.

    admin

    Keep Reading

    Gombe tells Arewa Students to use their 2.1m Votes to Rescue Nigeria

    HURIWA tackles Tinubu govt over alleged ₦500m image campaign amid insecurity

    Uche Nwosu seeks overhaul of Igbo apprenticeship system, urges diaspora investment

    Cruz, US Lawmakers Accuse Tinubu Govt of Using PR to Mask Killings

    Pay Troops Better, Ndume Tells Tinubu, Backs Army Expansion

    Ted Cruz’s Remarks on Nigeria Fuel Dangerous Divisions, Says Senator Kawu Sumaila

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    National Update
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    © 2026 National Update. Designed by Lamark Cre8ives.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.