Opinion
ANALYSIS: How National Assembly fared under Magaji’s watch

Anytime critics argue that the Nigerian National Assembly has no clear significance in people’s lives due to the high level of hardship, some political mercenaries will argue otherwise and sometimes pick offence for the criticisms. Who is right and on what basis?
Sani Magaji started his leadership as acting Clerk of the National Assembly in 2022, following the retirement of Architect Amos Ojo. To assess his leadership, it would be fair to use developments at the National Assembly, especially cooperation and welfare of staff.
Peaceful coexistence
Compared to previous administrations, there has been peaceful coexistence of parliamentary union and management of the National Assembly especially in terms of welfarism. There is no record of protest since Magaji assumed office.
The only time the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) opposed the leadership of Magaji as CNA was after the two chambers passed a bill to extend the tenure of service legislative staff at the National Assembly from 35 to 40 years and their retirement age from 60 to 65 years.
But, the parliamentary union later supported the extension.
NASS Library
The construction of the National Assembly library started during the 9th Assembly under the chairmanship of Ahmed Lawan as senate president and Femi Gbajabiamila as speaker of the House of Representatives.
It was completed and commissioned last in May to commemorate the nation’s 64th Independence Anniversary. It is serving members of the staff and the public.
The library was named after President Bola Tinubu and It is now to be called “Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu Building.”
Construction of hospital
The clinic of the National Assembly was renovated to a standard taste. Aside from the renovation, the management constructed another 50-bed facility for staff members and visitors.
The medical center is also equipped with medical personnel.
Renovation
Aside from the medical facilities, the National Assembly management completed renovation of the two chambers.
Bill to extend tenure
There have been arguments and a series of debates on the bill to extend tenure of legislative staffers. The bill is specifically seeking to extend the tenure of service of legislative staff at the National Assembly from 35 to 40 years and their retirement age from 60 to 65 years.
It was first introduced during the 7th Assembly. It was transmitted to the 8th Assembly and subsequently to the 10th Senate.
When the bill was first debated on the floor of the senate in February, the majority of the senators disagreed with it because it would be cost-effective and there would not be an opportunity to employ and train new entries. The decision of the majority of the senators forced the upper chamber to step down the bill and direct further research and consultation with stakeholders.
A week after, the bill came up in the Senate again and was passed. The same also happened at the House of Representatives. The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, chaired the conference committee to harmonise the effectiveness of the bill between the two chambers.
Amidst the passage, some groups, including the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) criticised it but all the aggrieved parties later supported the tenure extension.
Later in September, seven months after the two chambers passed, President Bola Tinubu declined the bill. Mr Tinubu cited “careful examination and consultation” as reasons for his decision.
On a close look, the large number of legislative officials who have retired between 2022 till date and those who are to be retired soon may affect effective legislative activities at the National Assembly especially in the aspect of handling official documents.
Previous extensions
Extension of tenure in the civil service is not a new agitation.
In June, President Tinubu signed a bill to raise the uniform retirement age for judicial officers in Nigeria to 70 years.
Before now, state and federal high court judges must quit the bench once they clocked 65. Similarly, judges of the National Industrial Court and Sharia and customary courts of appeal must retire at 65, while judges of both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court can remain on the bench till they are 70.
But with the bill signed into law by President Tinubu, the retirement age of all the judges has been uniform.
Former president Muhammadu Buhari extended the retirement age of teachers from 60 to 65 years and their period of service from 35 to 40 years.
In 2012, former president Goodluck Jonathan,
increased the retirement age of staff in the professorial cadre in the universities from 65 years to 70 years and polytechnic and College of Education lecturers from 60 to 65.
Opinion
All roads lead to Wukari as David Sabo Kente walks Tall @ 60

By Ben Adaji
On the 3rd of March 2025, Chief (Dr.) David Sabo Kente will be celebrating his 60th Birthday, otherwise referred to as Diamond Jubilee in Wukari, his country home and native Local Government in Taraba State.
Turning 60 is indeed a significant milestone, a time to celebrate the wisdom, experience, and achievements of a lifetime. It’s a momentous occasion that deserves a big celebration to be marked with heartfelt words and warm wishes.
Whether from family members, friends, colleagues as well as political and business associates, or from captains of industry, Chief Kente is worth the time.
Chief (Dr.) David Sabo Kente, popularly known as DSK, ( born 3rd March 1965) is a Nigerian businessman, politician and philanthropist who is the founder and CEO of “DSK Group International Ltd” and an NGO “DSK Foundation”.
No doubt Kente, an accomplished businessman and renowned politician will be celebrated for his integrity, brilliance, expertise, charisma and outstanding commitment to philanthropic gesture and kindness to humanity.
Indeed, Chief (Dr.) David Sabo Kente is a rare gem. An averagely tall, light, always sounding ebullient, happy and captivating businessman, he is also an APC Chieftain that is endowed with exceptional leadership traits and resilient for positive transformation.
It is indeed a statement of fact that Kente is an unrepentant apostle of revolutionary change in the nation’s political circle.
As a respected leader, Kente has made significant impact through his DSK Foundation, which has provided scholarships to hundreds of students, donations to orphanages, and supported the less privileged in society.
His philanthropic work has earned him several awards, including the “Ambassador of Peace and Societal Development” and “Icon of Humanitarian Services” by the Taraba State Students Union
Recently, he was conferred with honourary doctorate degree by the Kwararafa University Wukari during the university’s second and combined convocation ceremony at the main campus in Wukari, Taraba state. It was a momentous occasion that celebrated the achievements of Kente and his immense contributions to the society.
He was the candidate of SDP in the 2015 Taraba State Gubernatorial election before he joined the All Progressives Congress in 2016. DSK aspired for the number one seat of Taraba State under APC in 2023. He once served as the National Assembly’s Director of Finance and a former member of the North-east Development Commission (NEDC) where he was the chairman Board of Trustees of the its Education Endowment Fund.
Chief (Dr.) David Sabo Kente, a philanthropist and politician pa excellence and his amiable Wife, Esther are expected to host over five thousand well-wishers, made up of family members, friends, colleagues, business and political associates from all over the country and beyond at Wukari.
The five routes of Ibi, Takum, Zaki-Biam, Kente and Jalingo, leading to Wukari town would be receiving unprecedented visitors from 1st, 2nd and 3rd March for the three days event.
Hon. Shuaibu Ataka, Chairman of the Central planning committee said all arrangements have been completed for the three days event.
On his attainment of Diamond age, the legendary businessman and political Icon can only count his blessings and give praise and glory to God, the Exalted, for His kindness. He has shown him mercy for equipping him with the intellect to fulfill his dreams and for endowing him with the strength and desire to serve humanity, the best he can.
Chief (Dr.) David Sabo Kente is happily married to Esther and the union is blessed with Six Children.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY CHIEF
Opinion
Edo guber dispute: APC breaks defence jinx, calls witnesses, PDP presses cancelled, ‘single vote’ over-voting

By Ehichioya Ezomon
The main proceedings of the Election Petitions Tribunal (EPT) – hearing the challenge to the election of Senator Monday Okpebholo as Governor of Edo State on September 21, 2024 – came to an end on Thursday, February 13, 2025, when the All Progressives Congress (APC), as the 3rd Respondent, closed its defence after calling four of pledged 28 witnesses in its two-day outing at the tribunal in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
However, the APC closure of its defence – coming in similar abrupt manner by the Petitioners (Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Dr Asue Ighodalo) on February 3; the 1st Respondent (Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)) on February 6; and the 2nd Respondent (Okpebholo) on February 10 – sparked instant recrimination between the Edo State chapters of the APC and PDP over alleged “witness sabotage” engineered within and/or outside the APC fold.
While such fiercely-partisan bickerings are a routine between the ruling and main opposition parties in Edo State; several issues croped up on February 12, and February 13 when the APC opened and closed its defence at the tribunal.
One, the APC broke the near “no-show” jinx in the Respondents’ camp by calling four witnesses to testify for it. Two, the witnesses were Local Government Agents or Local Government Collation Agents for the APC. • Three, the witnesses admitted there’re over-voting in some polling units, many of which, they noted, were cancelled by INEC’s officials on poll day.
Four, yet, PDP/Ighodalo have queried the same cancelled over-voting results in their petition
Five, most of the PDP/Ighodalo contested polling units recorded a single over-vote. How? • Six, by calling witnesses to testify for it, the APC may’ve brought both a sigh of relief and a cold comfort to the party members and supporters in Edo State, and the country at large.
Certainly, the APC’s defence brought a “sigh of relief” in that, for its members and supporters – many of them (like in the general public) ignorant of the intricacies of prosecuting election petitions – it’d been long nights in 16 days, since the hearing proper began on January 21 at the tribunal.
The party members and supporters have had to endure emotional torture, as they watched “edited clips” or read on social media how counsel and witnesses for PDP/Ighodalo took the INEC, Okpebholo and APC through the legal grinding mill at the proceedings, first in Benin City, Edo State capital city, and then in Abuja.
The APC’s also given members and supporters “cold comfort” because, besides having no illusions about the PDP/Ighodalo petition against the election of Okpebholo as Governor, they’re not as optimistic about the tribunal outcome as the Acting Chairman of the Edo APC, Emperor Jarrett Tenebe.
Reacting to the Plaintiffs closing their petition on February 3, after calling 19 of the hundreds of witnesses earmarked to testify for them, Tenebe told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that PDP/Ighodalo “abandoned their case abruptly because they have no case ab initio,” boasting that when the Respondents opened their case, “the whole country and the people of Edo in particular would know that the APC won the election.”
Tenebe appeared hasty to criticise PDP/Ighodalo, as the INEC, through Kanu Agabi (SAN), on January 6, closed its defence without calling any witness, thus giving PDP an opening to offer “expert opinion” to the 1st Respondent, noting, “This abrupt end to INEC’s defence leaves the electoral body relying solely on cross-examinations and arguments from APC and Okpebholo’s lawyers.”
This was as Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN), for the Plaintiffs, told the tribunal, after Agabi’s request, that, “Frankly speaking, we are not surprised and it is well within the right of the 1st Respondent (INEC) to show such good discretion. We are not objecting.”
At the resumed proceeding on February 6, Agabi told the tribunal that his team had shelved the idea of bringing witnesses after it reviewed the case, adding, “My Lords, after we left you yesterday (Wednesday), we gave more thought to the matter and came to the conclusion that the sensible thing to do is to close the case of the 1st Respondent, which we hereby do.”
The chairman of the three-man tribunal, Justice Wilfred Kpochi (with Justices A.B. Yusuf and A.A. Adewole) in the petition marked, EPT/ED/GOV/02/2024, then ruled: “The request (by INEC via Agabi) is granted and the first Respondent’s case is hereby closed,” and adjourned to February 10, for Okpebholo to open his defence, which he did by calling one witness, and closing his case.
Among a plethora of alleged electoral infractions, the three-man tribunal of Justices Wilfred Kpochi (Chairman), A.B. Yusuf and A.A. Adewole, in the petition marked, EPT/ED/GOV/02/2024, is looking mainly into irregularities of over-voting, non-serialisation of electoral materials, incorrect computation of the total number of votes cast in many polling units, which reportedly exceeded accredited voter-count recorded by the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) that the INEC deployed for the ballot.
The Plaintiffs’ witnesses (19 of them) and counsel had honed in on those alleged poll indiscretions, to prove that the 291,667 votes (about 51.1%) credited to Okpebholo (APC, Edo Central) as winner of the election, and 247,274 votes (about 43.3%) scored for Ighodalo, a Lagos-based Lawyer and business tycoon, were “manufactured” by the INEC, APC and Police to favour Okpebholo.
In their testimonies, the witnesses attempted to demonstrate alleged suppression, inflation and alteration of votes to the detriment of Ighodalo, pointing out votes that should’ve been counted or cancelled, and claiming that INEC’s rigging of the process amounts to a serious breach of the Electoral Act 2022 (as amended).
With the reported “brilliant performances” by PDP/Ighodalo’s witnesses and legal teams bolstering the Plaintiffs’ claims of massive fraud at the poll they said Ighodalo won, and should be declared as Governor of Edo State; the APC members and supporters were hopeful that the Respondents would match the Plaintiffs’ submissions.
But when it’s turn to open defence on Thursday, February 6, the INEC (Ist Respondent) closed the case without calling any of the five witnesses it’d insisted the previous day (February 5) would testify for it.
Blindsided by INEC’s counsel, Agabi’s closure of the case, counsel to Okpebholo (2nd Respondent), Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), prayed for adjournment to Monday, February 10, to enable him “move the five witnesses” to be called from Benin City to Abuja, with Justice Kpochi acceding and adjourning sitting to February 10.
But when the hearing resumed, Okpebholo called only one witness, Majek Osumah, an APC polling agent from Ward 7, Unit 4, Ovia Southwest Local Government, who testified that the election was conducted peacefully, but that the result was cancelled due to over-voting, and that in Form EC8B, the column for the result of his Unit 4 had no record.
Against the foregoing, the APC members’ and supporters’ worries and anxieties increased, as the 3rd Respondent opened its defence on Wednesday, February 12, which, to its (APC’) credit, broke the “defence jinx,” and called four witnesses.
They witnesses include: Afuda Theophilus Idemudia, 54, a businessman resident in Benin City, who monitored the poll in Esan North East Local Government Area; Kamarudeen Coker Bello, 54 years, a businessman, lives in Igarra, and served as a Local Government agent of the APC in Akoko-Edo LGA; Engr. Gabriel Iduseri, APC’s Collation Agent for Oredo LGA; and Hon. Frank David, APC’s Collation Agent for Owan West LGA, all of whose testimonies, reported by The Nation on February 12, are run below with some abridgements:
“Led in evidence by Echezona Etiaba (SAN), the first witness, Afuda Theophilus Idemudia, told the tribunal that the result of the poll from the Esan North East LGA was signed by the agent of the PDP.
“He confirmed that under Exhibit PCB-40, titled: Ballot Paper and Verification Statement, the Part A of the document was expected to be completed by an official of INEC before the opening of poll, while Part B was to be completed after the close of election.
“When handed a copy of the documents to confirm, the witness, said: ‘Yes, I can see serial numbers recorded on this document. They are: 0459785 and 0460292,’ maintaining that serial numbers of Ballot Papers issued to the respective polling units were filled.
“Under cross-examination by a lawyer to the petitioners, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), the witness confirmed that the number of accredited voters in Unit 11, Ward 6, was 96, and upon Owonikoko’s request, the witness calculated the votes to be 97, with APC getting 53 votes, PDP 43 votes, and one rejected vote.
“The second witness, Kamarudeen Coker Bello, who admitted his signed statement on November 9, 2024, and adopted it while being led by Etiaba, confirmed, nder cross-examination by Owonikoko, that the petitioners raised allegations of over-voting in 17 polling units in Akoko-Edo LGA.
“The third witness, Engr. Gabriel Iduseri, claimed that there was no complaint about the conduct of the election by agents of the parties that participated in the contest in Oredo LGA, even as he he admitted that the result from polling unit 8, Ward 10, was cancelled at the Ward Collation Centre due to over-voting; and that it’s the responsibility of electoral officers to confirm the correctness or otherwise of results submitted at the LGA level.
“Asked if he was aware there was a table of 53 and 66 polling units in Oredo LGA, where petitioners alleged that INEC recorded the results incorrectly, the witness said though he read the petition, he could not recall the number of the disputed polling units.
“The fourth witness, Hon. Frank David, said that INEC officials diligently collated all results from the polling units in Owan West LGA, and none of agents queried the final result, adding that he, the PDP and Labour Party (LP) agents signed the result sheets of the election.
“Cross-examined, David said he was aware that INEC officials ought to fill details of sensitive materials handed to them for the poll, but he could not confirm if the procedure was followed since he did not serve as an official of INEC during the election.
“Handed the IReV report of Form EC8A of Ward 4 Unit 19, the witness confirmed that although only 36 persons were accredited, votes recorded for the unit were: 28, 1 and 8, amounting to 37, indicating one over-vote.
“While he confirmed that the exhibit containing the votes from Ward 8, Unit 8, were: 54 and 25, totaling 79, with 1 marked as rejected vote, making it a total of 80 votes; the witness claimed the results from Unit 5 were cancelled owing to over-voting.”
Thereafter, lead counsel to the APC, Emmanuel Ukala (SAN), announced that his client was preparing a schedule of documents to tender when the proceedings resume, and the tribunal adjourned till February 13, when the APC closed its defence without calling any of the pledged 24 additional witnesses.
Explaining the decision to close the defence, counsel to APC expressed confidence in the unimpeachable legal defence mounted for the poll victory of Governor Okpebholo. So, Ferdinard Orbih (SAN) addressed the tribunal, as reported by award-winning journalist from Edo State, Mr Sebastine Ebhuomhan, as follows:
“Yesterday (Wednesday, February 13), we promised that we will exchange our schedule of documents today in order to make for a seamless presentation of our witness testimony. My Lord, I am sorry to say the documents we were expecting did not arrive.
“However, we have done a further comprehensive review of the evidence led by the petitioners, the evidence received from the petitioners under cross-examination, the evidence led so far by the respondents in this tribunal, the documentary evidence before this tribunal…
“My Lord, we have also considered that time is of (the) essence. The judicial time of this honourable tribunal is precious. My Lord, taking all the enumerated factors into serious consideration, we are happy at this stage to close the 3rd respondent’s case as it pleases Your Lordship.”
Responding to the application to close their case, Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN) for the Plaintiffs, highlighted, with a jab, the surprising “abandonment” of the 3rd Respondent’s scheduled 28 witnesses after calling just four of the witnesses.
“My learned counsel has just addressed the court. I’m actually not quite sure about the state of those documents. I can only say ‘he who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day.’ So, we have no objection,” Oyeyipo said.
Even with no objection from the other Respondents (INEC and Okpebholo), Orbih replied Oyeyipo’s poking, thus: “My Lord, I’m still on the point of fact. When they (Plaintiffs) scheduled 99 witnesses and presented only 19, we didn’t accuse them of running away. They have no business with how we conduct our case. We remain here. We are not running away.”
Despite pleadings by the Respondents and Plaintiffs for more days to prepare their written addresses, Justice Kpochi stood his ground and closed the defence of the 3rd Respondent (APC), and acceded to seven days for the Respondents, five days for the Petitioners and extra three days to file their final written addresses, which counting began on Friday, February 14, and adjourned the tribunal to Monday, March 3, for the adoption of the written addresses.
Going forward, the battle of wits between PDP/Ighodalo (Petitioners) and APC/Okpebholo (Respondents) for the Governorship, and political soul of Edo State continues in the next 13 days till the March 3!
Mr Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria. Can be reached on X, Threads, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp @EhichioyaEzomon. Tel: 08033078357
Opinion
N96bn LG Fraud: Nazi Obaseki and Fellow Treasury Looters Have Murdered Sleep in Edo State

By Fred Itua
Governance at the grassroots level is the most fundamental pillar of democracy. When local government councils, which are closest to the people, fail in their responsibilities, the impact is felt directly by citizens through stalled development, poor infrastructure, and diminished public trust. This is why the recent report of the Investigative Panel on Local Government Finances in Edo State is not just another document; it is a call to action.
The decision to set up the Investigative Panel was not arbitrary; it was necessitated by growing concerns over financial mismanagement across the 18 Local Government Councils. The alarming lack of visible developmental projects, despite substantial allocations, raised critical questions that demanded answers. It was in response to these concerns that the government, committed to transparency and accountability, constituted the panel to conduct a thorough investigation into the financial activities of the councils.
With a mandate to examine revenue inflows, expenditure patterns, and the overall financial integrity of the councils, the panel embarked on a meticulous process, employing forensic analysis, document reviews, and interviews with key stakeholders. Although some challenges were encountered, including late and incomplete financial records, the panel was still able to piece together a revealing and deeply troubling picture.
The panel’s findings are damning. Over ₦95 billion accrued to the councils between September 4, 2023, and the present, yet very few meaningful projects were executed. Instead, the panel uncovered widespread financial recklessness, including:
1. Diversion of Public Funds – The sum of ₦10.4 billion was funneled into an ALGON (Association of Local Governments of Nigeria) account under the guise of “Security, Trainings.” This account, rather than serving the public, became a conduit for siphoning government resources, with funds being transferred to private individuals and companies.
2. Dubious Transactions Through Private Entities – The report identified corporate beneficiaries such as Rokuosa Enterprise (₦3.4 billion), Demarriots Hotels Limited (₦1.07 billion)—a hotel owned by the impeached Orhionmwon Local Government Chairman—and Kezmith Global Ventures (₦2.01 billion). These funds, meant for local government development, were instead funneled into private hands.
3. Unjustifiable Withdrawals from Local Government Accounts – The report details over ₦5.1 billion in suspicious withdrawals across various councils, with notable individuals pocketing significant sums. For instance, Ahonsi Ogieegbaen Osifo withdrew over ₦556 million across multiple councils, while others, like Eric Agbonmwanre (₦394 million) and Abraham Burma (₦337 million), also benefited from this financial hemorrhage.
4. Obstruction of Investigations – The panel also faced deliberate attempts to hinder its work, with council personnel failing to provide timely records and later attempting to influence the process through unethical means.
The revelations in this report are not just numbers on paper—they represent stolen opportunities for development, broken trust in leadership, and a blatant disregard for the welfare of the people. To allow these findings to be swept under the carpet would be a gross injustice to the citizens who depend on local governments for basic amenities and services.
Governor Monday Okpebholo-led administration will take decisive action.
1. Full Implementation of Sanctions – Those implicated in financial mismanagement will face legal consequences. Public officials should be held to account, and no political cover will be provided to shield the guilty.
2. Recovery of Stolen Funds – Every kobo illegally taken from the public treasury will be traced and recovered. The government will work with financial institutions, the EFCC, and other anti-corruption agencies to retrieve misappropriated funds.
3. Strengthening Financial Oversight – This report has exposed weaknesses in the system that is being urgently addressed by the Okpebholo administration. There will be stricter monitoring of local government accounts, mandatory public disclosures of budgets and expenditures, and independent auditing mechanisms to prevent future abuses.
4. Prosecution and Deterrence – It is not enough to simply remove corrupt officials; they must face legal consequences. Governor Okpebholo is sending a strong message that corruption at the grassroots level will no longer be tolerated.
This investigative report will not gather dust in government archives. It will serve as a turning point for local governance in Edo State. The government has taken a bold step by uncovering these irregularities, but it will further show its commitment to accountability in its resolve to act on these findings. Implementing the recommendations to the letter is not just an administrative necessity by the Okpebholo administration —it is a moral obligation to the people, and Governor Okpebholo is ready to act fast.
The grassroots deserve better. The people deserve accountability. For Godwin Obaseki, PDP public funds looters and impeached local government chairmen, their sun will set at noon.
Fred Itua is the Chief Press Secretary to Edo State Governor.
-
Crime1 year ago
Police nabs Killer of Varsity Lecturer in Niger
-
News1 year ago
FCT-IRS tells socialite Aisha Achimugu not to forget to file her annual returns
-
Appointment1 year ago
Tinubu names El-Rufai, Tope Fasua, others in New appointments
-
Kogi1 year ago
INEC cancells election in 67 polling units in Ogori-Magongo in Kogi
-
Kogi1 year ago
Echocho Challenges Tribunal Judgment ordering rerun in 94 polling units
-
News1 year ago
IPOB: Simon Ekpa gives reason for seperatists clamour for Biafra
-
Metro11 months ago
‘Listing Simon Ekpa among wanted persons by Nigeria military is rascality, intimidation’
-
News1 year ago
Kingmakers of Igu/ Koton-Karfe dare Bello, urge him to reverse deposition of Ohimege-Igu