Law
LP, Obi fail to prove how they scored majority of votes – PEPC
The Labour Pary (LP) and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, have failed to prove how they scored the majority of lawful votes in the February 25 presidential election, the Presidential Election Petitions Court has held.
Justice Abba Bello Mohammed, who read the lead judgment indicated that the LP made generic allegations of irregularities, suppression of votes and corrupt practices to rob them of their votes, especially in Rivers, Benue, Lagos, Taraba, Imo and Osun states but they failed to specify the polling units so affected.
Justice Mohammed explained further that LP also failed to prove the allegations of overvoting against the All Progressives Congress (APC) and their actual reduced votes.
While highlighting a claim by the respondents that Obi’s petition only alleged that there were widespread irregularities without giving the particulars and the polling units Justice Mohammed held that in a presidential election held in 176,866 polling units in 774 Local Government Areas, it would be improper not to specify where there were irregularities.
According to him, the petitioners only made generic allegations.
“Pleading must set out material facts and particulars. In the instant petition, there was no effort to prove specific allegations, particulars of complaints,” said the Tribunal.
The law is clear that where someone alleges irregularities in a particular polling unit, such a person must prove the particular irregularities in that polling unit before that petition can succeed, the Tribunal added.
The court said the petitioners did not prove the particular polling unit where the election did not take place, nor did they specify particulars of polling units where there are alleged complainants of irregularities.
“It was only in one instance that figures were given of alleged suppressed votes, and we all know that elections are about figures,” it said.
“LP alleged that INEC reduced their scores and added it to APC votes but failed to supply particulars of what they actually scored before the said reductions, neither did they supply the polling units where it happened….”