In a historic ruling that reverberates across international legal and diplomatic circles, the High Court in Nairobi, Kenya, has declared the 2021 abduction and rendition of Biafra agitator and Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, as illegal, unconstitutional, and a gross violation of his fundamental rights.
Justice E.C. Mwita, delivering a 13-page judgment on Tuesday, June 24, 2025, held both the Kenyan and Nigerian governments liable for Kanu’s forceful seizure and transfer, citing violations of constitutional rights and established extradition procedures.
The court awarded Kshs 10 million (approximately ₦119.5 million) in damages against the Kenyan government for its role in the “state-sponsored abduction, torture, and illegal transfer” of Kanu, who had entered Kenya lawfully as a British citizen.
“The abduction and subsequent forcible removal of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu from Kenya to Nigeria was in violation of the laws of Kenya and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010,” Justice Mwita ruled.
“It was unconstitutional, illegal, and a breach of his fundamental rights and freedoms.”
The judge noted that Kanu was held incommunicado, tortured, denied medical care, and eventually chained and deported without due process. Kenya, the court said, had a constitutional obligation to protect Kanu as a lawful entrant.
The judgment has been hailed as a significant legal milestone and a blow to the controversial practice of “extraordinary rendition” — the covert transfer of individuals across borders without due legal process.
IPOB, reacting to the judgment, described it as a “judicial earthquake” that validates its claims of state-sponsored international kidnapping and rights abuse.
In a statement signed by its spokesperson, Emma Powerful, the group said:
“This judgement vindicates our long-standing position that what transpired in Nairobi in June 2021 was not extradition, but a criminal act of extraordinary rendition involving the highest authorities of the Nigerian and Kenyan governments.”
“The ruling exposes a chain of international crimes against Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and places a permanent stain on the legacy of former Presidents Uhuru Kenyatta, Muhammadu Buhari, and their enablers.”
The legal team representing Kanu in Kenya was led by renowned constitutional scholar and former anti-corruption czar, Professor P.L.O. Lumumba, whose advocacy IPOB described as “brilliant, courageous, and unrelenting.”
“We are grateful beyond measure to Professor Lumumba and his team. Their work has not only served justice to Nnamdi Kanu but established a legal precedent that rogue states can no longer hide behind sovereignty to commit human rights abuses,” IPOB stated.
The group also commended the Kenyan judiciary, especially Justice Mwita, for resisting diplomatic pressure and standing for the rule of law.
“This verdict is a victory for the oppressed peoples of the world, and a warning to tyrants that borders will no longer shield them from justice,” IPOB added.
While the Nigerian government has yet to issue an official reaction, legal analysts say the judgment could trigger diplomatic tensions, international lawsuits, and renewed pressure on the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, which has continued to defend the controversial rendition.
IPOB has vowed to launch a global accountability campaign, targeting all officials complicit in the operation and urging international courts to hold them responsible under universal human rights law.
“This is not the end — it is the beginning of a wider reckoning. No one involved will be spared, whether in Nairobi, Abuja, or London,” the group warned.
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was reportedly abducted in June 2021 at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi and flown to Abuja on a private jet, without any court order or formal extradition process.
The incident sparked outrage across the world and became a lightning rod for debates around state power, ethnic self-determination, and legal process. Kanu has since remained in detention in Nigeria, facing charges of treason and terrorism — proceedings widely criticized as politically motivated.
With the Nairobi court’s decision now public, pressure is mounting on Nigerian authorities to re-evaluate Kanu’s detention and legal status.
Legal experts say the ruling could strengthen Kanu’s legal defenses in Nigerian courts, or even form the basis for international litigation against the Buhari and Tinubu administrations.
