Connect with us

Law

Nasarawa tribunal judgement; Gov Sule under pressure to jettison appeal

Published

on

From Abel Abogonye, Lafia

The embattled governor of Nasarawa State Abdullahi Sule is being pressured by political allies, party stalwarts and well meaning Nigerians to conceed defeat as pronounced by the Election Petition Tribunal justices who nullified his victory of the 28th March governorship election

Our reporter who monitored daily TV program on TVC News, noted that Nigerians were unanimous in their reactions to the tribunal judgement and thereby appealed to the governor to display the spirit of sportsmanship following the outcome of the judgement.

According to those who spoke while reacting to the judgement, forging ahead collectively for the development of Nasarawa state was the best way forward adding that these can be realized only when governor Abdullahi Sule toe the part of honour by accepting defeat.
APC lawyer, Dr Mubarak Adekilekun had appeared on the TVC station for an interview where he was said to have spoken against the judgement.
An Adamawa state indegene who identified himself as Emmanuel Bako wondered how a lawyer of repute will come before a National Television to disown issues that were obvious and in line with the law upon which the tribunal judgement was based

He argued that over voting in Gayam and Ciroma wards of Lafia local government were clear issue of manipulation, maintaining that results presented by the APC manually could not have been more authentic than the results uploaded from the INEC Biometric capturing machines.

Other Nigerians however, argued that the issue with the Nasarawa governorship election can not be in any way liken to the situation in Kano state.

“We are Nigerians and we have been monitoring the electoral processes in Nasarawa state. We therefore hold strongly that governor Abdullahi Sule ought to have congratulated the PDP candidate, David Emmanuel Ombugadu for the overwhelming support received from the people of Nasarawa State during the March governorship election”.

“We are not judges but it is wrong for a political party to describe a tribunal pronouncement as a monumental error. APC should not be a judge in their own case rather they should seek further legal redress instead of using a fowl language to describe a judgement delivered by a competent court

Meanwhile, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in the State has congratulated its members over the verdict of the governorship election tribunal which affirmed their candidate, Hon.David Emmanuel Ombugadu as the rightful and lawful elected governor of Nasarawa State.

In a statement signed by its publicity secretary, Ibrahim Hamza, the party said the victory did not come as a surprise because justice was served at last and correctly too.

The statement further called on party members and supporters to remain calm and celebrate moderately as well remain resolute as the party’s legal team is working hard to ensure total victory at all levels of the judicial process.

The statement commended the tribunal for “the painstaken attention to details, and the decision that was arrived based on merit of the case and did not allowed itself to be hoodwinked by mere technicalities, which the Respondents obviously wanted so badly.”

The party further revealed that following the outcome of the meeting with security services, all political parties were advised to restrict their political activities and those of the supporters to respective party offices and residence of the candidate for now, in the interests of peace in the state at large.

The party therefore advised its members against the use of vulgar words that could ignite tension and inflame passion capable of threatening peaceful coexistence or cause harm to persons or properties anywhere in the state.
Explaining that the security services have already upped their game in vigilance in order to forestall any unpleasant outcome and that mischief makers will be on their own.

Subsequently, the statement added, that the State PDP Chairman Hön Francis Orogu has directed all LG chairmen of the party to ensure compliance with the directive in the interest of peace in the state.

Meanwhile statewide celebration has continued since Monday till now. Both Muslims, christians and traditionalists have joined in the celebration across villages and communities in the state and beyond over the victory of David Ombugadu.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Law

EFCC Grants Bail to Two Kogi Officials, wants Yahaya Bello’s Fraud Case adjurned

Published

on

By

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has granted administrative bail to two co-defendants, Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu, in a fraud case involving former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello. The case, centered on charges of fraud totaling N101.4 billion, has been adjourned until November 27, 2024, by the Federal High Court in Abuja.

At the hearing before Justice Maryann Anenih, EFCC Counsel Jamiu Agoro requested an adjournment, noting that the 30-day compliance period for Bello’s summons, issued on October 3, had not yet expired. Agoro explained that the November 20 court date was inconvenient for the prosecution, and that seeking an arrest warrant would be premature as Bello still had a few days to respond to the summons.

Both the second and third defendants’ legal representatives supported the adjournment request.
Following this, Justice Anenih approved the EFCC’s request, extending the deadline for Bello’s appearance and authorizing service of the hearing notice to be sent to his last known address.

In a parallel development, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Maitama ordered a hearing notice to be posted at Bello’s residence on Benghazi Street, Wuse Zone 4, Abuja, and on the court’s notice board.
This step follows multiple missed court appearances by Bello since the public summons was issued, urging him to appear for arraignment on 16 counts related to the alleged fraud.

Justice Anenih emphasized the importance of due process, setting November 27, 2024, as the final date for Bello’s court appearance. This case has drawn attention to the EFCC’s efforts to enforce accountability among high-profile figures in Nigeria amidst allegations of large-scale financial mismanagement.

Continue Reading

Law

Appeal Court Sacks MC Oluomo as NURTW National President, Reaffirms Baruwa’s Leadership

Published

on

By

Musiliu Akinsanya

In a significant development, the Court of Appeal has annulled the appointment of Musiliu Akinsanya, popularly known as MC Oluomo, as the National President of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW).
The ruling upheld a previous ruling by the National Industrial Court, which had already recognized Tajudeen Baruwa as the rightful leader of the union.

The legal dispute surrounding the NURTW’s leadership has been ongoing, with tensions escalating within the organization.
Despite the court’s ruling in favor of Baruwa, MC Oluomo was recently elected by the Southwest Zone of the union during the Quadrennial Delegate Conference held last week in Osogbo, Osun State.
This election took place amid growing concerns and disputes within the union’s regional factions.

The Appeal Court’s decision is expected to settle the leadership question, restoring Tajudeen Baruwa’s position as the legitimate National President of the NURTW.
However, the union faces potential challenges in maintaining unity across its various regional branches, as supporters of MC Oluomo continue to advocate for his leadership.

This ruling marks a pivotal moment for the NURTW, as it works to stabilize its governance and address internal divisions that have led to several controversies and disputes over recent years.

Continue Reading

Law

Supreme Court Rejects States’ Legal Challenge to EFCC’s Constitutionality

Published

on

By

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has thrown out a lawsuit brought by several state Attorneys General challenging the constitutional validity of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The case, led by Kogi State, questioned the EFCC Act, arguing that it bypassed constitutional requirements regarding international treaties.

The seven-member panel, headed by Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, ruled unanimously to reject the lawsuit, deeming it without merit. Kogi State’s counsel, Mohammed Abdulwahab, SAN, argued that the EFCC Act’s incorporation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption was unconstitutional, as the law had not received approval from a majority of state Houses of Assembly, as required by Section 12 of the 1999 Constitution. This, he claimed, invalidated the EFCC Act and similar anti-corruption laws.

The plaintiffs also contended that the EFCC and NFIU lacked the authority to investigate state or local government funds, accusing the agencies of encroaching on state powers. Abdulwahab sought a court ruling to nullify the creation of these agencies, arguing it would prevent a potential constitutional crisis.

Attorney General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, defended the EFCC, asserting that dismantling Nigeria’s anti-corruption agencies would harm the nation’s efforts to combat financial crimes. He argued that the National Assembly has the authority to create laws applicable nationwide to address corruption.

The court ultimately upheld the EFCC Act, ruling that the National Assembly’s legislative powers on corruption are valid and enforceable across all states. Justice Abba-Aji noted that Kogi’s revelations about state officials being investigated exposed ulterior motives behind the lawsuit, describing it as an attempt to shield certain officials.

“No state has the right to enact laws that contradict the statutes passed by the National Assembly,” Justice Abba-Aji said, delivering the judgment. The court dismissed the suit in its entirety, reaffirming that the EFCC Act and other federal anti-corruption laws remain constitutional and enforceable across Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update