2027: CSO Coalition Says Political Party Proliferation Threatens Electoral Efficiency

A coalition of civil society organisations has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to urgently hear and determine the suit seeking constitutional interpretation on the deregistration of certain political parties ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The group, Coalition of Civil Society Groups for Peace, Security, Good Governance, Equity and Justice, described the case as a critical constitutional test capable of shaping Nigeria’s democratic and electoral future.
In a statement signed by James Okoronkwo, Executive Director of the coalition, in Abuja the coalition indicated that the matter goes beyond politics and raises fundamental questions about constitutional compliance, electoral discipline, and the responsibilities of institutions created by the Constitution.
The organisation also defended the role of the Attorney General of the Federation, praising him for what it described as a proper understanding of his constitutional obligations as the nation’s chief law officer.
“The Attorney General must be commended for appreciating the burden placed on his office as Chief Law Officer of the Federation and custodian of the Constitution,” the coalition stated.
The group, however, condemned recent public criticisms directed at the AGF over the suit, particularly allegations reportedly made by Zenith Labour Party National Chairman, Dan Nwanyanwu, accusing the Attorney General of allegedly masterminding the case.
The coalition described such accusations as reckless and unnecessary, insisting that disagreements over constitutional interpretation should be settled in court through legal arguments rather than public attacks.
According to the organisation, Section 225A of the Constitution was deliberately inserted to address specific issues relating to political party regulation and should not be treated as a symbolic provision without practical effect.
“Constitutional democracy loses meaning once constitutional provisions become selectively enforceable depending on political convenience or emotional pressure,” the statement added.
The coalition further argued that the continued proliferation of politically inactive parties has complicated electoral administration and weakened democratic efficiency in the country.
While affirming support for democratic participation and multiparty democracy, the group maintained that democratic inclusion must still operate within constitutional boundaries.
It therefore urged the judiciary to rise above political sentiments and provide what it called “clear constitutional direction” on the matter ahead of future elections.