In a dramatic twist, the Federal High Court in Abuja has reversed its own order restraining the Nigerian Senate from investigating Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, effectively handing the upper legislative chamber a major victory in an ongoing power struggle.
The ruling, delivered by Justice Obiora Egwuatu on March 19, 2025, nullifies an earlier ex parte order that had temporarily shielded the Kogi Central senator from facing the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions. However, despite the initial court restriction, the Senate defied the order, proceeded with its investigation, and suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan on March 6, 2025.
The saga began on February 20, 2025, when a heated confrontation erupted between Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senate President Godswill Akpabio, GCON, over seat reallocation during a plenary session. Her conduct was deemed disorderly, prompting the Senate to refer her to its ethics committee.
Rather than defend herself before the committee, Akpoti-Uduaghan sought legal intervention, securing a court order on March 4 to halt the probe. However, in a bold show of legislative autonomy, the Senate ignored the order and moved forward with its disciplinary process, culminating in her suspension.
Faced with arguments that the ex parte order had preemptively decided the case, Justice Egwuatu reversed course on March 19, effectively reaffirming the Senate’s constitutional authority to discipline its members.
Legal experts are split on the significance of the court’s decision. Some see it as a necessary correction to an overreach by the judiciary, while others view it as an attempt to avoid an institutional clash with the legislature.
“This ruling signals a recognition that the Senate has the right to manage its internal affairs,” said constitutional lawyer Barr. Nnamdi Okeke. “But the bigger question is whether the courts should have stepped in at all.”
The legal battle is far from over, with the case adjourned to March 25, 2025, for further hearings on pending objections and applications. However, one thing is clear: the Senate has asserted its dominance, and the judiciary, at least for now, has stepped back.

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Godswill Akpabio