National
Constitution Review: Akuns, Nnadi clash at NCEF consultative meeting
Traditional Ruler of Daffo in Bokkos Local Government Area of Plateau State, Da Jonathan Sunday Akuns, and the promoter of Nigerian Indigenous Nationalities Alliance for Self Determination (NINAS), Mr. Tony Nnadi, Thursday disagreed over the modalities to be adopted in birthing a new Constitution for the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Akuns and Nnadi were among speakers at a consultative meeting convened by the National Christian Elders Forum (NCEF) on new constitution held via ZOOM.
Akuns contended that the 1963 Republican Constitution was not abrogated, all the House of Representatives need to do was to amend it to preserve Nigeria’s democratic and structural foundation.
He said “ethnic cohorts held a constitutional conference in Lagos on 25-26 July 1963 and mandated elected Members of the House of Representatives to enact the Republican Constitution with effect from January 10,1963.
“The enthroned autochthonous 1963 CFRN was never abrogated by military juntas, but simply suspended. Therefore, we need to carefully stitch the democratic strands of Nigeria by reviewing the autochthonous 1963 CFRN.”
Akuns, who is also an Economist and retired bank director, regretted that the Nigerian governing eras of 1966 to 1999 missed or messed with the opportunity to have called for the needed amendment of the 1963 constitution in order to restore the democratic foundations of the federal structure.
“As a result, the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN) suffered prolonged period of an interregnum that stifled and stunted the maturity of the tenets of republican governance in Nigeria. India is a global classic of republicanism in the nationhood strides of countries that also emerged by colonial creation.”
The former CBN director maintained that the best route for the constitution review process in the present circumstances is to tinker with the 1963 republican constitution, stressing that that is the best bet to preserve the democratic demands of constitution making.
But, countering Akuns’ postulations, the Executive Secretary of NINAS, Nnadi, argued that nothing short of a brand new corruption produced by indigenous nationalities can set the country right.
Nnadi, a lawyer and constitutional rights activist, noted that since sovereignty belongs to the people, the lie contained in the preamble of the 1999 Nigeria Constitution can only be cured by incorporating the inputs of Nigeria’s indigenous nationalities into a new constitution.
Citing Section 14 sub 2 of the Constitution, the NINAS chieftain explained that what the current National Assembly wants to do is not different from the past attempts at tinkering with the country’s grundnorm.
While insisting that amending the constitution would not berth equity and stability without suspending certain provisions stipulated by successive military regimes to foist a unitary constitution, Nnadi said there was need for a transitional procedure.
Another speaker, Elder Ayokunle Fagbemi, remarked that as the House of Representatives get ready to review the Constitution, it is necessary to build scenarios, noting that while the best case scenario is to birth a new constitution, the worse case scenario is that the legislature would not succeed in amending or getting a new constitution.
Fagbemi praised NCEF for the meeting saying that it would help to guide the Forum on the way forward as it prepares to engage with ethnic nationalities.
Earlier, the chairman of NCEF, Dr. Samuel Gani, disclosed that the consultative meeting was convened for Christian Elders to “deliberate on a new constitution for Nigeria and understand the different perspectives in the proposals for a new constitution before the NCEF with the ethnic nationalities.”
“Presently, there are four different perspectives in getting a new constitution for Nigeria, including *Amendment of the 1999 Constitution by the National Assembly.
“Adoption of the 2014 National Conference Report and its draft Constitution, *Adoption of the 1963 Republican Constitution (for) amendment to reflect current realities and A New Constitution developed by the ethnic nationalities,” he stated. Some of the dignitaries that attended the meeting included General Zamani Lekwot, Elder Nath Okoro, Mrs. Shola among others.
National
Senator Natasha Calls for Economic, Cultural Renaissance in Northern Nigeria
The Senator representing Kogi Central in the National Assembly, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has called for a rebirth of Northern Nigeria’s economy and cultural identity, urging the region to reclaim its historical standing as a center of agricultural and industrial prosperity. Speaking at the Sardauna Memorial Day in Kaduna, the senator emphasized the urgent need to revitalize the region’s economic output, which has sharply declined in recent decades.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan evoked the legacy of the Sardauna of Sokoto, Ahmadu Bello, whose leadership policies fostered economic growth and industrialization across Northern Nigeria in the mid-20th century.
She stressed that the once-thriving agricultural and industrial sectors in the region have deteriorated, diminishing its economic influence.
A Look Back to Economic Glory
The senator lamented the downfall of key industries, highlighting the sharp decline in Northern Nigeria’s groundnut industry. She pointed out that in 1959, groundnut exports from Northern Nigeria to the United Kingdom were valued at £27 million—equivalent to ₦3.6 trillion today. However, she noted that the industry now generates a meager $3 million annually, signaling a significant loss in economic potential.
“The collapse of the groundnut trade and other key industries represents a tragic loss to our region,” Akpoti-Uduaghan said. “We were once an economic powerhouse, but now, we are seeing a shadow of what we once were.”
The senator also cited the fall of the cotton industry, once integral to both local and global economies, with the Kaduna Textile Mill serving as a vital employment hub. Today, she said, the cotton industry has all but vanished, despite the global market generating $21 billion annually.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan urged Northern leaders to adopt a more progressive, developmental mindset to revive the region’s industries. She called for strategic planning and innovation to rebuild the entrepreneurial ecosystems that once flourished.
“It is crucial that we focus on rebuilding our economic resilience. We must move beyond dependence and work towards a prosperous future by harnessing our agricultural and industrial potential,” she urged. “This is the time for bold leadership.”
In her speech, Akpoti-Uduaghan also discussed the importance of economic diversification, acknowledging that while recent tax reforms have raised concerns, the region’s resistance is due to its lack of preparedness. She emphasized that a diversified economy would better withstand such changes, pointing out that a thriving groundnut industry could have alleviated the shock of economic reforms.
“Had we maintained a strong agricultural base like the groundnut industry, these reforms wouldn’t be as disruptive,” she said. “It’s time to stop making excuses and take concrete steps toward economic renewal.”
The senator further stressed the importance of preserving the North’s cultural heritage as part of the region’s revival. She called on all stakeholders—leaders, civil society, and citizens—to collaborate in protecting the cultural values that have defined the North for centuries.
The Sardauna Memorial Day event, which honored the legacy of Ahmadu Bello, saw the attendance of prominent figures such as Kaduna State Governor Senator Uba Sani, represented by Abdulazeez Ishak, and Northern Elders Forum Chairman, Prof. Ango Abdullahi.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s impassioned address has sparked renewed conversations about the North’s potential to reclaim its role as a major economic force in Nigeria.
With a call for innovative leadership and economic rejuvenation, the senator is leading the charge for the region to restore its economic vitality and cultural prominence.
National
Alaafin Oyo Throne: Makinde Seals Royal Transition Amid Kingmakers’ Rift
Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State has officially presented the staff of office to Prince Abimbola Owoade as the new Alaafin of Oyo, solidifying a royal transition that has sparked controversy among the Oyomesi, the traditional kingmakers of Oyo.
The ceremony, held on Monday, comes nearly three years after the passing of the late Alaafin, Oba Lamidi Olayiwola Adeyemi III, and despite resistance from five members of the Oyomesi, who argued that Prince Owoade’s selection was not legally sanctioned.
In a letter addressed to Governor Makinde, the dissenting kingmakers, represented by Adekunle Sobaloju (SAN), maintained that Prince Luqman Gbadegesin was their preferred candidate. The letter was signed by prominent Oyomesi members, including High Chief Yusuf Akínade (Bashorun of Oyo) and others acting as stand-ins for key traditional roles.
However, the state government defended its decision, with Commissioner for Information and Orientation, Prince Dotun Oyelade, stating that Owoade’s selection followed rigorous consultations and divinations, aligning with royal traditions.
The new Alaafin hails from the Owoade-Agunloye royal family and brings a distinguished academic and professional background to the throne. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineering from both the University of Sunderland and Northumbria University in the UK and has served in key engineering roles, including his current position as a Project Coordinator at Manitoba Hydro, Canada.
This historic moment signifies a fresh chapter for the Oyo monarchy, even as it stirs discussions on the balance of power between the government and traditional authorities. As Prince Abimbola Owoade ascends the throne, the state looks forward to a reign that fosters unity and development for the Oyo Kingdom.
National
Mambilla Power Saga: Nigeria’s Cross-Examination Debacle Looms at ICC Arbitration
****Obasanjo, Buhari, Others Set to Testify as Mambilla’s 52-Year Legacy Hangs by a Thread
The International Court of Arbitration in Paris is set to witness high-profile legal drama as Nigeria faces potential disgrace in its decade-long battle over the $6 billion Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project. The landmark case, initiated by Sunrise Power and Transmission Company against the Federal Government of Nigeria, reaches its climax this January.
Once a beacon of hope for Nigeria’s energy independence, the Mambilla project, conceived in 1972, now symbolizes decades of political interference, corruption, and bureaucratic bungling.
With the final arbitration hearing on the horizon, Nigeria’s chances of escaping liability appear grim, especially as key witnesses, including former ministers Abubakar Malami and Mamman Saleh, are conspicuously absent.
First awarded in 2003 under a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model, the project has been dogged by abrupt policy reversals, contract cancellations, and re-awards.
The most controversial pivot came under President Olusegun Obasanjo, who shifted from BOT agreements to procurement contracts, fracturing the initial plan. Successive administrations, including those of Presidents Yar’Adua, Jonathan, and Buhari, oscillated between reviving the original agreement and renegotiating settlements.
The hearing promises explosive revelations as former Presidents Obasanjo and Buhari testify alongside ex-ministers and experts. Buhari is expected to defend his administration’s controversial 2017 re-award of the project, while Obasanjo faces scrutiny for altering its trajectory during his tenure.
Both are set for rigorous cross-examination, with Obasanjo’s testimony particularly fraught with detours into past scandals, including his BBC HARDTalk interview where he was labeled “the grandfather of corruption in Nigeria.”
The absence of Malami and Saleh, pivotal to the government’s defense, casts a long shadow over Nigeria’s case. Their negotiated settlement agreements with Sunrise in 2020—a $400 million compensation deal—remain critical but controversial elements of the dispute. Meanwhile, Sunrise’s star witness, former Attorney General Michael Aondoakaa, is poised to dismantle Nigeria’s counterclaims with damning insights into governmental lapses.
Beyond the courtroom drama, the stakes for Nigeria are monumental. A protracted legal battle and possible adverse judgment could further delay the project by six years, exacerbating the country’s energy crisis. With less than 4,000 MW of electricity shared among 240 million citizens, Mambilla’s delay perpetuates a cycle of economic stagnation, industrial decline, and social unrest.
President Bola Tinubu’s administration inheritd a quagmire of broken promises and unmet potential. While hopes for transformative leadership remain, the arbitration outcome will test Nigeria’s resolve to break free from decades of mismanagement.
Without decisive action, the Mambilla dream could remain just that—a dream, leaving millions of Nigerians in darkness.
-
Crime1 year ago
Police nabs Killer of Varsity Lecturer in Niger
-
News12 months ago
FCT-IRS tells socialite Aisha Achimugu not to forget to file her annual returns
-
Appointment1 year ago
Tinubu names El-Rufai, Tope Fasua, others in New appointments
-
Kogi1 year ago
INEC cancells election in 67 polling units in Ogori-Magongo in Kogi
-
Kogi1 year ago
Echocho Challenges Tribunal Judgment ordering rerun in 94 polling units
-
News1 year ago
IPOB: Simon Ekpa gives reason for seperatists clamour for Biafra
-
Metro10 months ago
‘Listing Simon Ekpa among wanted persons by Nigeria military is rascality, intimidation’
-
News1 year ago
Kingmakers of Igu/ Koton-Karfe dare Bello, urge him to reverse deposition of Ohimege-Igu