Connect with us

Judiciary

Timi Frank tells Supreme Court Justices to be patriotic, put Nigeria first

Published

on

Supreme Court Justices to put the interest of Nigerians first for the sustainability of democracy as they adjudicate on the appeals challenging the eligibility of Bola Ahmed Tinubu as president, former deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Timi Frank appealed.
Frank’s call in a statement in Abuja, iß coming against the background of hearing notices from the court to parties in the case fixed for Monday and the setting up of a seven-man panel of Justices to hear the appeals filed by three presidential candidates challenging the outcome of the February 25 election and the subsequent dismissal of their petitions by the tribunal.

Those in court are Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP), and Chichi Ojei of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

The Supreme Court Justices empannelled to sit on the appeals include Justices Musa Dattijo Muhammad, Uwani Musa Abba Aji, Lawal Garba, Helen M. Ogunwumiju, I.N. Saulawa, Tijjani Abubakar, and Emmanuel Agim.

Frank who is the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP), Ambassador to East Africa and the Middle East, urged the Justices to know that the appeals they are about to hear would remain the toughest, far-reaching and represents the most difficult decision they would ever make in their long years of stewardship at the bench.

Frank said: “We know there will be intense pressure on you, Justices, to do the wrong thing. There will be promises, gifts, and inducements.

“Some of you are about to retire. What reputation do you want to retire with? Do you want to retire with blood-stained wealth given the number of people whose blood were shed during the election without peace in your conscience? You can be vindicated today by man who wants you people to do injustice and inflict more pains on Nigerians. Will you also be vindicated by God? What do you want to be remembered for upon retirement?”

He added: “This is not about Atiku Abubakar, it’s not all about Peter Obi, it’s not about the APM party. But it’s about the legacy and precedent that you are about to hand down in Nigeria. The supreme Court as the last line of defense of democracy and the rule of law must fulfil its duty and this is the moment to do so.

“Therefore this is not the time to base your ruling on technicalities.

“Judge within your consciences and God to know if the arguments before you are viable or not. You
must thoroughly weigh the facts and the truth before arriving at a decision.”

He noted that the whole world has seen the facts and they know the truth about what transpired during the elections.

“They also know who submitted a forged certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The courts in other jurisdictions have proven
and certified some of these facts.

“This is not time for the Supreme Court to reject any evidence that is germane to unraveling the truth and doing justice in the case notwithstanding arguments that the Supreme Court will not admit new evidence,” he said.

He urged the justices not to seek to protect the interests of one party or one man against over 200 million Nigerians, home and abroad, that are now anxiously waiting for truth to prevail.

“Already the world has lost confidence in the Nigerian judiciary. Nigerians and members of the international community have lost confidence on the judiciary. But we believe this is time to prove the nay sayers wrong.

“This is the time for the justices to restore hope in the judiciary. Your decision would either rekindle hope in the country or further destroy it.”

He noted that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kayode Ariwoola, while addressing 22 newly sworn-in judges of the Federal High Court recently said the constitution must be considered in deciding each case brought before them.

According to Ariwoola, “Several vitriolic attacks are regularly heaped on the judiciary; it is, however, crystal clear that public opinion, no matter how serious or weighty it might be, cannot override or supersede the Constitution of the country which we apply in deciding each case.

“Nevertheless, your Lordships still owe your conscience and the generality of the Nigerian masses, particularly those who are looking up to you, the great responsibility of good moral rectitude and acceptable conduct to uphold and consolidate the trust reposed in you.”

Frank said: “We agree with the CJN that the constitution must be the basis of arriving at a decision in the instant case. The Justices of the Supreme Court that would hear this appeal would owe their decisions to the provisions of the constitution, their consciences,
God and the good of the country.

“Already, members of the ruling party and those in government are celebrating their expected favourable outcome of the appeal which points to the fact that they are privy to how the Justices will rule which Nigerians do not know, if that be the case, man would have spoken but God and posterity will speak for Nigerians at the end of the day.

“We urge the Justices to be bold and courageous like the Kenyan Supreme Court Justices that today are a shining example and a reference point as an upright and unbiased judiciary in the continent of Africa.

“Defend our laws. We are not demanding for you to do anything against the law as Nigerians, but respect the constitution which forbids candidates from presenting forged certificates to INEC,” he declared.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Political Prejudice, Low Awareness Hinder Effective Criminal Justice Implementation – Stakeholders

Published

on

By

By Ahmed Rufa’i, Dutse

Political prejudice and low public awareness have been identified as the major obstacles to the fair and effective implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law in society.
This was the focus of a strategic meeting of key stakeholders organized by the Cleen Foundation in Dutse, Jigawa State.

The meeting, which brought together security agencies, the judiciary, law practitioners, civil society organizations, and the media, target to address the challenges affecting the criminal justice system.

During his opening address, the Executive Director of Cleen Foundation, Mr. Gad Peter, highlighted other issues such as harmful cultural practices, tradition, and corruption as further hindrances to justice.

According to Mr. Peter, the strategic meeting sought to advocate for and promote gender equality in the administration of criminal justice within the state.
“The purpose of this policy dialogue is to bring all the principal actors in the criminal justice system together to discuss and develop strategies for addressing gaps identified in the system,” he said.

He emphasized the importance of the effective implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law in promoting justice, equity, fairness, peace, and stability in the country. “Everyone has a role to play in achieving these desired goals,” he noted.

Addressing the specific challenges faced by women and marginalized groups, Mr. Peter said, “Women and individuals from marginalized groups often face unique challenges and biases within the criminal justice process. Addressing these issues is not only the right thing to do but is also crucial to achieving a truly just system.”

He further stated, “Together, we can work towards a criminal justice system that is not only effective and fair but also reflective of our collective commitment to justice and equality for all.”

Participants at the meeting pledged to collaborate in addressing these key challenges and to promote equality within the state and national justice system.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Ododo Condemns Attack on SDP Ajaka, Urges Swift Action by Security Agencies

Published

on

By

Muri Ajaka

Governor Usman Ahmed Ododo of Kogi State has issued a stern condemnation of the violent attack on Alhaji Muritala Yakubu Ajaka, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate in the November 11, 2023, governorship election.
The incident occurred on Friday, August 23, 2024, shortly after the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in favor of Governor Ododo in a case filed by Ajaka challenging the election’s conduct and outcome.

Ajaka, who had taken his case from the election petition tribunal through the Appeal Court and up to the Supreme Court, was reportedly assaulted by political thugs within the premises of the Supreme Court. The attack, which has sparked widespread outrage, took place just after the court’s ruling.

In response to the incident, Governor Ododo, through a statement by the state Commissioner for Information and Communications, Kingsley Femi Fanwo, expressed his deep concern and condemned the attack in the strongest possible terms.
He described the actions of the attackers as “barbaric, uncivilized, and a grave danger to the institution of justice.”

Governor Ododo called on law enforcement agencies to promptly identify and arrest the perpetrators, ensuring they face the full consequences of their actions. He emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity and safety of court environments across the country.

“As a Government, we implore the law enforcement agencies to fish out the perpetrators and make them face the full wrath of the law to serve as a deterrent to others as well as protect the integrity and safety of our court environments across the country,” the statement read.

Governor Ododo also urged Nigerians to reject violence and embrace constitutionalism and unity, aligning with the core values of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. He called for national support for the government’s policies aimed at the progress and development of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Kogi Guber Tussle: Supreme Court Set to deliver Landmark Verdict

Published

on

By

Muritala Ajaka/Usman Ododo

The Supreme Court is set to deliver a landmark judgement on Friday, August 23, 2024, in the Kogi State Governorship election case between Muritala Yakubu Ajaka of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The apex court’s decision will bring to a close the prolonged legal battle between the two parties, which has been ongoing since the election. The court had earlier declined a request by the SDP to constitute a full panel to hear the appeal.

A five-member panel of justices, led by Hon. Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, has been appointed by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, to decide the case.
The other justices on the panel are Hon. Justice Ibrahim Mohammed Musa Saulawa, Hon. Justice Tijjani Abubakar, Hon. Justice Abubakar Sadiq Umar, and Hon. Justice Mohammed Baba Idris.

The judgement will have significant implications for the political landscape of Kogi State and the country at large.
The SDP and APC have been engaged in a fierce legal battle, with both parties confident of emerging victorious.

Political analysts have described the case as a test of the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the outcome is eagerly awaited by Nigerians.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update