Connect with us

Law

Its time to rein in Farotimi for attacks on the president over CSU -Mkpanam Ekpo

Published

on

***The President’s fundermental rights must not be trampled upon

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) should sanction the spokesperson of the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Barrister Dele Farotini, over his utterances against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Rt. Honourable Mkpanam Obo-Bassey Ekpo has said

This was contained in a statement made available to journalists by honorable Ekpo in Qbuja on Friday

Hon. Ekpo, who is a former Member of the Cross River State House of Assembly, described the uterances credited to the Dele Farotimi as a denigrating usurpation of the powers of the judiciary.

Hon Ekpo querried the legal practitioner over his response to Dr Reuben Abati’s question with a comment that ‘the person occupying the highest office in the land is a career criminal’ when he recently appeared as a guest on Arise News TV Morning Show along with one Oladotun Hassan on 5th October, 2023.

Hon. Ekpo noted that despite being cautioned by Dr Abati to desist from using such derogatory language or making such conclusions since the allegation has not been pronounced upon by a court of competent jurisdiction, Dele Farotimi continued his callous assault on the person and integrity of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

He said “There is no doubt that there is a well defined line between freedom, liberty or simply put, “freedom of expression” and unwarranted denigration of the rights/powers of other individuals and institutions including the judiciary.’

According to Ekpo, any legal practitioner should not only know the distinctive line between freedom of speech and unwarranted denigration of the judiciary and violation of the rights of others, but must also constantly respect same in his conduct and utterances especially in the public and media platforms.

He explained further that it has become virtually a normal routine for Dele Farotimi to address the Nigerian judiciary with vitriolic diatribes mostly riddled with disparaging remarks, innuendos and unsubstantiated claims or allegations. That he spares no arm of government in his largely callous and pedestrian incendiaries.

‘These are, to say the least, conducts and vituperation unbecoming of a supposed Legal Practitioner who talks so much about respect for rule of law, fundamental rights and democratic constitutionalism.’

Rt. Honourable Mkpanam said he wonders what has become of the presumption of innocence until found guilty in favour of anyone accuses of commiting an offence.

‘When has Dele Farotimi become “a court of competent jurisdiction,” to warrant his usurpation of the powers vested solely by the 1999 Constitution as amended on the very courts, nay judiciary that he holds in utter contempt, devoid of his duty to demonstrate conducts that show respect, integrity and professionalism towards the judiciary?’ He questioned.

He questioned Farotim’s status as a supposed human Rights acitivist who disdainfully desecrates the very sanctity of the rule of law and respect for human rights, and still have rhe moral turpitude to denigrate the judiciary.

The former lawmaker said another legal practitioner and former nollywood actor, Kenneth Okonkwo, who is also a spokesperson of the Labour Party and a member of its legal team, while appearing on the same TV station, was reported to have said that the ‘sitting President is ‘a certificate forger’.

‘A phrase that neither the Chicago State University nor its Registrar has used let alone has any court of competent jurisdiction adjudicated upon it and convicted President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at anytime as alleged till date.’ he stated.

Hon. Ekpo expressed dismay at the kind of democracy Dele and his cohorts are trying to save or enthrone by what he described as their constant cherry picking or pandering on narratives or mischievously cooked alternative facts, routinely bandied on the media merely to lubricate their inexplicable fixations or prejudices, masqueraded as love for Nigeria .

He, therefore, urged Dele Farotimi who is an acclaimed advocate of the rule of law, democratic constitutionalism and fundamental rights to respect the same constitutional order which he claims to defend.

He added, ‘The facts/issues on the validity of President Tinubu’s graduation from the Chicago State University and his certificate and or academic transcript, especially the depositions of the Registrar of the CSU under oath are not just in the public domain, but are before the Supreme Court to evaluate and give its verdict thereon one way or another.’

Rt. Hon. Ekpo reminded Farotimi that as an interested party and a member of the Labour Party, he should allow the Supreme Court to carry out its constitutional duty by determining the fate of president Bola Ahmed Tinubu devoid of despicable denigration and preemptive verbal assaults.

He further noted that it was hight time that Dele Farotimi and his cohorts were called to order, adding that it’s quite hypocritical for a human rights activist/lawyer to routinely accuse government’s prosecutory agencies of media trial and violation of the rule of law while indulging in same media trial against their political opponents, yet expect right thinking Nigerians and the international community to take them seriously.
In his words, ‘Democracy, respect for rule of law and fundamental rights of individuals and institutions, are not virtues that must be subjected or solely invoked to lubricate the parochial sentiments, prejudices and predispositions of any individual or group of individuals.’

Hon. Ekpo warned that as long as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is still the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, his fundamental rights and the respect that accrues to his Office must be duly accorded him especially by those who claim to be advocates of democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Law

Tribunal Rebukes PDP for Witness Absence in Edo Gubernatorial Case

Published

on

By

The Edo State Gubernatorial Election Petition Tribunal, on Tuesday, expressed its displeasure with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Asue Ighodalo, for failing to produce witnesses in their petition challenging the outcome of the September 21, 2024, governorship election.

Presiding over the tribunal’s first sitting in Abuja following its relocation from Benin, Justice Wilfred Kpochi criticized the PDP’s inability to utilize the scheduled time effectively, stating it had wasted judicial resources.

The tribunal, which was relocated to Abuja amidst security concerns and fears of possible arson, had cleared its docket on Tuesday to focus solely on the PDP’s petition. However, the party’s counsel, Adetunji Oyeyipo, SAN, cited travel disruptions as the reason for the absence of key witnesses, despite prior commitments.

“My lords, most of our witnesses faced travel difficulties. We assure you they will be available at the next sitting,” Oyeyipo pleaded.

Justice Kpochi, visibly irked, questioned the seriousness of the petitioners. “Why then did we reschedule other matters to prioritize yours? We could have heard other cases today.”

Despite Oyeyipo’s plea for understanding, the tribunal adjourned the matter to Thursday, emphasizing the need for expediency in the proceedings.
Earlier in the session, Mr. Oseyili Anenih, who served as the PDP’s Director of Research and Strategy during the election, admitted under cross-examination that his observations were based on reports from the party’s situation room, not direct interactions with polling units.
Anenih revealed that PDP is contesting the results from 765 of Edo’s 4,519 polling units, alleging that many valid votes were not properly transmitted to the state collation centers. He also confirmed the party’s reliance on screenshots of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines, as they lacked physical access to the devices.
While acknowledging inconsistencies in the stamping of results, Anenih argued that the stamped copies represented a significant sample of the alleged irregularities.
The PDP and Ighodalo have asked the tribunal to nullify the election of Governor Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC). They allege widespread non-compliance with the Electoral Act and other irregularities, arguing that their candidate secured the majority of valid votes.
Governor Okpebholo’s counsel, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, dismissed the claims, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence from the petitioners.
As the tribunal prepares to resume on Thursday, all eyes remain on the PDP to present its case and witnesses. The outcome of the petition could significantly impact the political landscape in Edo State.

Continue Reading

Law

Alleged Fraud, Land Grabbing by Rebecca Omokamo: Falana Chambers Petitions EFCC, ICPC

Published

on

By

Legal powerhouse, Falana and Falana Chambers, has filed petitions with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) against Rebecca Omokamo Godwin Isaac, also known as Hajia Bilikisu Ishaqu Aliyu, and her firm, Homadil Realty Limited.
The allegations include financial fraud, forgery of documents, and illegal land grabbing involving Plot 4022 in Guzape, Abuja.
The petitions, made on behalf of the Yesufu family, accuse Mrs. Omokamo and her associates of conspiracy, forgery, and fraudulent acquisition of funds.
The legal battle dates back to 2014 when Mrs. Omokamo allegedly purchased the disputed land but subsequently lost its title documents.
The Yesufu family claims ownership and has been in protracted legal and investigative disputes over the land.
In a related incident in May 2024, a PREMIUM TIMES reporter, Emmanuel Agbo, investigating the case, was summoned by the police after communications with Mrs. Omokamo.
She denied the allegations in conversations but later accused the EFCC of harassment in an open letter to President Bola Tinubu. Mrs. Omokamo claimed EFCC interference in what she called a civil matter, further alleging the unjust detention of her husband and staff.
However, subsequent investigations by the EFCC and the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) reportedly uncovered extensive fraudulent dealings tied to Mrs. Omokamo.
The findings led to separate petitions to the ICPC, prompting further investigations into alleged forgery of land titles and fraudulent sales involving multiple properties, including a 2.3-hectare plot in Katampe District, Abuja.
Efforts to resolve the matter amicably, including appeals by Mrs. Omokamo’s husband and traditional rulers to the Yesufu family, reportedly failed. Allegations emerged that Mrs. Omokamo had sold the Katampe property to over 60 victims using forged documents.

Her purported resistance to settlement and her legal maneuvers to block investigations drew criticism.
In October 2024, Mrs. Omokamo filed a motion at the Federal High Court in Abuja to prevent further investigations by the EFCC and ICPC. Simultaneously, her husband reportedly sought forgiveness from the Yesufu family, a move seen as contradictory given Mrs. Omokamo’s legal actions.
The Yesufu family, represented by Falana and Falana Chambers, has called for the prosecution of Mrs. Omokamo, her husband, and their accomplices.
They also requested investigation reports to aid civil proceedings. Meanwhile, the company’s secretary, Mr. Kolawole James Olowokere, recently withdrew his

Continue Reading

Law

Osun Governor grants Christmas Clemency to chicken, egg thieves on death row

Published

on

By

In a bid to mark the 2024 Christmas season with acts of compassion, Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke, has granted clemency to Segun Olowookere and Sunday Morakinyo.
They were sentenced to death in 2014 for robbery-related offenses committed in 2010.
The duo, aged 17 at the time, had been convicted of stealing two fowls, eggs, and mobile phones from individuals in Okuku, Osun State.
Despite the minor theft, the court had sentenced them to death by hanging in 2014, sparking nationwide outrage over the severity of the punishment.

Ademola Adeleke


They were granted a prerogative of mercy alongside 51 other convicts who had varying levels of sentences in correctional centres in Osun, by the governor.
The governor’s decision, made on the recommendation of the State Advisory Council on the Prerogative of Mercy, highlighted a broader push for prison reforms and justice review in the state.

Governor Adeleke, through his spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed, stated that the clemency alignsled with constitutional powers and the spirit of the season.

“This exercise of mercy follows the recommendations made by the State Advisory Council and underscores the administration’s commitment to fairness and humanity,” Rasheed said in a statement.

The letter of commutation, dated December 24, 2024, has been officially acknowledged by prison authorities.

The governor’s move has sparked debates over Nigeria’s judicial process, with human rights advocates praising the decision as a step toward addressing sentencing disparities and prison decongestion.

The case of Olowookere and Morakinyo, sentenced as teenagers, drew public attention due to the severity of their punishment relative to the crime.
Their release is expected to reignite discussions on justice reforms and youth rehabilitation programs.

In his address, Governor Adeleke emphasized the importance of second chances and pledged to continue reviewing cases deserving of mercy while balancing justice with compassion.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update