Connect with us

National

Obasanjo’s botched 3rd term bid stirs another controversy at Edwin Clark’s book presentation

Published

on

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s Third term ambition that was knocked out in 2006 has sparked off another controversy at the public presentation of Chief Edwin Kaigbodo Clark’s autobiography on Thursday when the book reviewer Professor Osarenwen Osumbor disagreed with a reproduced account from another book, ‘The Accidental Public servant’

He described El-rufai’s account in his book as a fiction and fallacy adding that the account in the book about himself was not true.

Obasanjo, in 2006, had sought to extend his tenure beyond the constitutionally-allowed two terms of four years each.
The former president, who was also the country’s military ruler between 1976 and 1979, wanted the National Assembly to amend the 1999 Constitution to enable him prolong his stay in office.
El-Rufai’s ‘Accidental Public Servant’ book in which is a tell-all memoir, reflected on a life in public service to Nigeria, the enormous challenges faced by the country, and what can be done while calling on a new generation of leaders to take the country back from the brink of destruction.
However, the book also captured the aborted third term saga where a reference was made to Osumbor who was also a senator at the time.
Osumbor while reviewing the book “Brutally Frankly’ had faulted the author for an extensive quotation of excerpts from Mallam El-Rufai’s book “The Accidental Public servant” which he described as pure fiction and fallacious.

“The most serious shortcoming is the author’s copious reproduction, reference to and reliance on the statements and opinions of other people many of which may be unreliable and unverifiable. 
“An example of this is at page 559 where he quoted in extenso excerpts from Mallam El-Rufai’s book “The Accidental Public servant. 
“In the relevant portion, the author refers to a discussion at Aso Villa between President Obasanjo, Senate President Ken Namani and others as they mulled the idea of stopping live television broadcast of the Senate debate of the Third Term. 

According to him, Chief Tony Anenih is quoted to have said that he will get Professor Osunbor to move the motion. 

He went on –

“The following day, we learnt that Professor Osunbor went to the clerk of the Senate and asked that a motion be raised of urgent national importance, with no topic. This allowed – any senator can move to table a motion of urgent national importance” with no further detail. The clerk put the motion in the order paper. On the appointed day, Professor Osunbor fell miraculously ill and had to be admitted to hospital, so there was nobody to raise the motion”.

“This is pure fiction and fallacious. First, it is the prerogative of the President of senate to decide whether to allow a motion of urgent national importance and if satisfied, would direct the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Business to put it on the Order Paper. 

“The Clerk of Senate has nothing to do with it. At any rate, a motion on the modality of Senate Debate will be a matter of privilege which can be raised by any Senator without notice at anytime and once the relevant Order has been invoked it cannot be refused and must be allowed by the Senate-President, much less the clerk of Senate. 

Osumbo while extricating himself said, “At no time have I fallen miraculously ill and from 1999 when I entered Senate till date, I have never been admitted to any hospital.
“Importing such falsehoods into a book diminishes its quality.”

He however described the book as an excellent literary work, rich in political history (ancient and contemporary) of Nigeria. 

“It deserves to be in every library as an invaluable reservoir of knowledge. The finishing is good and the memorable pictures which adorn some 35 pages speak more than a thousand words.
However he observed that there was a big omission. “The author tells us that his great-grandfather had 100 wives, his grandfather had 40 and his father had 7 but he was silent on the number of wives he himself had married. Maybe he is still counting.”

“BRUTALLY FRANK makes very interesting reading. The author’s clear memory and recollection of dates, names, places and events is impressive and phenomenal. This could partly be attributed to good record keeping.

“The book is not without flaws, though minor, many of them typo and spelling such as “constant tenants” instead of “customary tenants (p. 64), “Justice Omo Eboh” written as “Omoibo” (p. 159) and “Awkunanaw” written as “Okunanu” (p. 167). 
“At times, the language is intemperate such as using the word “stupid” (P.359), this is obviously in anger but not appropriate in a book. 

The event that took place at the International Conferecmnce Center, Abuja, chaired by former Head of State Gen(rtd) Yakubu Gowon, had President Bola Tinubu; Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP); Maryam Abacha, wife of the late former head of state; Adeyeye Ogunwusi, Ooni of Ife; Ado Bayero, Emir of Kano, Theophilus Danjuma, former Nigeria’s chief of army staff; among personalities in attendance.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

Edo Governor Joins National Economic Deliberations

Published

on

By

Edo State Governor, Senator Monday Okpebholo, attended his inaugural National Economic Council (NEC) meeting on Thursday at the State House Council Chambers in Abuja.
The session was presided over by Vice President Kashim Shettima.

The NEC serves as a vital forum for state governors, deputy governors, and the federal government’s economic team to discuss and address key economic challenges.

In a gesture to mark his first appearance, Governor Okpebholo was invited by Vice President Shettima to lead the opening prayer after the national anthem.

This event underscores Edo State’s active commitment to collaborating on national economic policies and driving solutions for Nigeria’s progress.

Continue Reading

National

At Achebe Forum, Obasanjo Labels Nigeria a ‘Failing State’ Criticizes Tinubu’s Leadership

Published

on

By

Olusegun Obasanjo

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has expressed sharp criticism of President Bola Tinubu’s administration, stating that Nigeria’s decline is now evident to “every honest observer.”
Speaking at the Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum at Yale University in the U.S., Obasanjo attributed the country’s deteriorating state to leadership failure, pointing specifically to Tinubu’s governance, which he referred to as “Baba-go-slow and Emilokan.”

In his keynote address titled “Leadership Failure and State Capture in Nigeria,” Obasanjo highlighted that pervasive corruption and mismanagement have worsened Nigeria’s challenges, driving the country deeper into insecurity, division, and underdevelopment.
He quoted the late writer Chinua Achebe, who in his book The Trouble with Nigeria argued that the country’s fundamental problem is a failure of leadership, not a flaw in its people or resources. According to Obasanjo, this diagnosis remains as relevant today as it was over 40 years ago.

Obasanjo cited works by American experts Robert Rotberg and John Campbell, who have characterized Nigeria as a “failed state.” Their argument, he noted, suggests that Nigeria’s inability to maintain security and stability has serious implications for Africa and the world at large.

Additionally, the former President described “state capture” as a pressing issue in Nigeria, where powerful individuals and groups exploit government resources and policies for personal gain. Obasanjo argued that this corruption undermines national interests, with influential elites shaping the country’s legal and economic systems to benefit themselves. Such practices, he warned, compromise public welfare, affecting the quality of education, healthcare, and infrastructure development.

In reflecting on Achebe’s legacy, Obasanjo praised the late author’s commitment to truth and the moral foundation he established for Nigeria. He urged Nigerians and the international community to recognize the dangers of state capture and work towards restoring a governance model that prioritizes the public good.

Continue Reading

National

Sule Lamido, Shehu sani disagree over National Security Adviser

Published

on

By

Shehu Sani and Sule Lamido

The senator who represented Kaduna Central Senatorial District in the 8th National Assembly, Shehu Sani has disagreed with a former Governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido over national security issues
Lamido had taken a strong position against the current National Security Advisor (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu accusing him of compromising his professional integrity and acting more like a spokesperson for President Bola Tinubu than fulfilling his constitutional role.
Sani advised Lamido to at least appreciate how the Tinubu led Administration tackled insecurity instead of politicizing it in his comment on the National Security Adviser.
Ribadu who was basking in the euphoria of the recent claims of decimating the insurgents cautioned anyone “not to dare Tinubu”, espercially the new Lakurawa Insurgents a development which infuriated the former governor of Jigawa State and a Chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party,(PDP), prompting him to take to his verified facebook wall to describe the NSA as “loquacious, flippant and qualified to have been Tinubu’s Minsiter of Information instead of NSA.”
Lamido Criticizes NSA for Sycophantic Behavior, Urges Focus on Duties.
Lamido in his comment had expressed concerns over the NSA’s behavior, particularly his past actions as the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) under President Olusegun Obasanjo. Lamido reminded Nigerians of the NSA’s controversial remarks, including his public labeling of prominent governors—such as Tinubu, Kalu, and Akume—as the “most corrupt.” Lamido pointed out the stark contradiction between the NSA’s earlier criticisms and his current position, serving under the same figures he once condemned.

The former governor called the NSA’s decision to join the administration of President Tinubu—a leader he previously described as corrupt—a “singular mistake,” one that Lamido believes has tarnished the NSA’s credibility and character. “You are not a spokesperson for the President, you are a National Security Advisor,” Lamido emphasized, urging the NSA to return to the professionalism that has historically defined the role.

Lamido argued that previous holders of the NSA position, including the late Umaru Shinkafi, General Gusau, and Colonel Dasuki, all displayed discipline and a low profile, focusing on security matters without resorting to public displays or sycophantic behavior. Lamido lamented that the current NSA’s behavior reflects a departure from this standard, pointing to his increasingly vocal and partisan approach.

Rather than fulfilling his duties as an anonymous and diligent security advisor, Lamido claimed that the NSA’s moral dilemma and excessive displays of loyalty to the president have shifted him into the role of a “Minister of Information,” undermining the neutrality and importance of his position.

In closing, Lamido urged President Tinubu to allow his NSA to regain focus, remove his fears, and return to the professional standards expected of someone in such a sensitive and critical role. The criticism continued to ignite debates about the role of the NSA and the expectations of public office holders in Nigeria, with many calling for greater transparency and consistency from those in power.
Reacting, Shehu Sani countered Lamido in a statement on Friday in Abuja, saying there should be a credit and a commendation for an administration that inherited multi-faceted security challenges ,but which has been reduced to the barest minimum, wondering how the elderly statesman failed to acknowledge the many triumphs of government in bandits hotbed regions in the north.

Sani who served in the upper legislative Chamber in the 8th National Assembly said, he witnessed to the appropriation budget allocated to security which unfortunately did not abate security challenges before now, expressing that Nuhu Ribadu has achieved what many of his predecessors have failed to accomplish despite the hundreds of billions spent in the name of defence and security in the past;

According to him, bandits have been neutralized to a large extent, thus encouraging government in this direction until total victory should have been ideal rather than playing haywire politics which he said may not help the yet-volatile situation in the North.

He said: “Neutralisation of top bandit leaders, end to mass abductions of students in northern schools,

“Securing rail lines and major northern highways hitherto notorious for kidnappings. The prompt response to terrorist attacks on power lines is worth mentioning.

“Security challenges are not over but in all indices of comparison, he has performed better and set unprecedented records. His political critics are fully entitled to their views ,but his delivery on his mandate is unparalleled.”, Sani concluded.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update