Connect with us

Judiciary

Natasha asks Tribunal to declare her winner of Kogi Central senatorial election

Published

on

The senatorial candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for Kogi Central in the 25th February 2023 general elections has asked the National and State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal to declare her winner

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had declared Abubakar Sadiku-Ohere of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as winner of the February 25 election for Kogi Central senatorial district with 52,132 votes against Akpoti-Uduaghan’s 51,763 votes.

When the case came up for adoption of written addresses before the tribunal led by Justice K.A. Ojiako in Lokoja on Wednesday, her counselss Umeh Kalu (SAN) and Johnson Usman (SAN), counsels to Akpoti-Uduaghan, prayed the tribunal to declare the PDP candidate winner of the election.

Usman said aside other hard facts presented to the tribunal, evidence of 751 votes that was suppressed proved Akpoti-Uduaghan was a clear winner of the senatorial election.

“We have brought before this tribunal facts and figures, which your lordship only need to calculate and come out with the actual results of that election for Kogi Central Senatorial seat.

“We tendered three results at different occasions and all these results from the same origin and in contents and are clear as to our client’s victory and to mean that this petition stands unchallenged.

“If we just go by the results tendered, and pick only one in which reads 751 votes that was suppressed, Akpoti-Uduaghan is a clear winner of that election.

“This is because they claimed Sadiku-Ohere won with only 369 votes. Therefore, if the 751 votes are added to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s, that one alone settles the matter to declare her as the winner of that election,” Usman argued.

However, while adopting their written addresses, counsels to Sadiku-Ohere, APC and INEC, Messers M.Y. Abdullahi (SAN), S.A. Abbas and Dayo Akinlaja (SAN) as 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents respectively, prayed the tribunal to dismiss her petition for lacking in merit.

Akinlaja argued in his final written address that the petitioners in paragraphs 31 – 44 of their petition could not give concrete evidences as to their claims and therefore, had only embarked on mere academic exercise.

“In those paragraphs, 31 – 44 and even paragraph 47, there are no evidences in support of their claims in the petition, which goes to show that it is but a sheer academic exercise.

“My Lord, in the absence of evidence in these crucial paragraphs, there’s no way this petition can stand. So l urge your lordship to dismiss the petition for lack of merit,” Akinlaja argued.

Also, Abdullahi, in his written address alleged that no witness gave evidence to the claims of the petitioners, which means that they (petitioners) only dumped documents on the tribunal without activating them.

“We pray that those paragraphs in which the petitioners couldn’t activate should be expunged and the petition be dismissed for want of evidences,” the counsel pleaded.

But the counsel to Akpoti-Uduaghan debunked the claims of INEC and Sadiku-Ohere, and prayed the Court to disregard their submissions and prayers and allow the petition.

Usman SAN said their address was explicit about their disagreement with the issues raised by the INEC and Sadiku-Ohere in their written addresses.

“My Lord, the replies of the 1st and 3rd respondents are frivolous and of no effect and should be disregarded. We urge your lordship to grant all our prayers in the petition.

“INEC is the conductor of the election and didn’t deny all the wrongs on the day of the election even as we cited authorities to prove that.

“Again, 1st and 3rd respondents alleged we failed to activate our statements. What about Prosecution witnesses (PWs) from the 2nd to 18th, who were eyewitnesses of all that happened at the polling units that came here and testified?

“Therefore, there are no other evidences that overshadowed those of PW2 – PW18. What’s even more concrete, is that PW20 is an INEC official, that gave evidence in this case,” he submitted.

The lead judge, Justice Ojiako, after hearing from all the parties as they adopted their written addresses, declared that the judgement has been reserved to a date to be communicated to all the parties involved

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Political Prejudice, Low Awareness Hinder Effective Criminal Justice Implementation – Stakeholders

Published

on

By

By Ahmed Rufa’i, Dutse

Political prejudice and low public awareness have been identified as the major obstacles to the fair and effective implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law in society.
This was the focus of a strategic meeting of key stakeholders organized by the Cleen Foundation in Dutse, Jigawa State.

The meeting, which brought together security agencies, the judiciary, law practitioners, civil society organizations, and the media, target to address the challenges affecting the criminal justice system.

During his opening address, the Executive Director of Cleen Foundation, Mr. Gad Peter, highlighted other issues such as harmful cultural practices, tradition, and corruption as further hindrances to justice.

According to Mr. Peter, the strategic meeting sought to advocate for and promote gender equality in the administration of criminal justice within the state.
“The purpose of this policy dialogue is to bring all the principal actors in the criminal justice system together to discuss and develop strategies for addressing gaps identified in the system,” he said.

He emphasized the importance of the effective implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law in promoting justice, equity, fairness, peace, and stability in the country. “Everyone has a role to play in achieving these desired goals,” he noted.

Addressing the specific challenges faced by women and marginalized groups, Mr. Peter said, “Women and individuals from marginalized groups often face unique challenges and biases within the criminal justice process. Addressing these issues is not only the right thing to do but is also crucial to achieving a truly just system.”

He further stated, “Together, we can work towards a criminal justice system that is not only effective and fair but also reflective of our collective commitment to justice and equality for all.”

Participants at the meeting pledged to collaborate in addressing these key challenges and to promote equality within the state and national justice system.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Ododo Condemns Attack on SDP Ajaka, Urges Swift Action by Security Agencies

Published

on

By

Muri Ajaka

Governor Usman Ahmed Ododo of Kogi State has issued a stern condemnation of the violent attack on Alhaji Muritala Yakubu Ajaka, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate in the November 11, 2023, governorship election.
The incident occurred on Friday, August 23, 2024, shortly after the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in favor of Governor Ododo in a case filed by Ajaka challenging the election’s conduct and outcome.

Ajaka, who had taken his case from the election petition tribunal through the Appeal Court and up to the Supreme Court, was reportedly assaulted by political thugs within the premises of the Supreme Court. The attack, which has sparked widespread outrage, took place just after the court’s ruling.

In response to the incident, Governor Ododo, through a statement by the state Commissioner for Information and Communications, Kingsley Femi Fanwo, expressed his deep concern and condemned the attack in the strongest possible terms.
He described the actions of the attackers as “barbaric, uncivilized, and a grave danger to the institution of justice.”

Governor Ododo called on law enforcement agencies to promptly identify and arrest the perpetrators, ensuring they face the full consequences of their actions. He emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity and safety of court environments across the country.

“As a Government, we implore the law enforcement agencies to fish out the perpetrators and make them face the full wrath of the law to serve as a deterrent to others as well as protect the integrity and safety of our court environments across the country,” the statement read.

Governor Ododo also urged Nigerians to reject violence and embrace constitutionalism and unity, aligning with the core values of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. He called for national support for the government’s policies aimed at the progress and development of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Kogi Guber Tussle: Supreme Court Set to deliver Landmark Verdict

Published

on

By

Muritala Ajaka/Usman Ododo

The Supreme Court is set to deliver a landmark judgement on Friday, August 23, 2024, in the Kogi State Governorship election case between Muritala Yakubu Ajaka of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The apex court’s decision will bring to a close the prolonged legal battle between the two parties, which has been ongoing since the election. The court had earlier declined a request by the SDP to constitute a full panel to hear the appeal.

A five-member panel of justices, led by Hon. Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, has been appointed by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, to decide the case.
The other justices on the panel are Hon. Justice Ibrahim Mohammed Musa Saulawa, Hon. Justice Tijjani Abubakar, Hon. Justice Abubakar Sadiq Umar, and Hon. Justice Mohammed Baba Idris.

The judgement will have significant implications for the political landscape of Kogi State and the country at large.
The SDP and APC have been engaged in a fierce legal battle, with both parties confident of emerging victorious.

Political analysts have described the case as a test of the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the outcome is eagerly awaited by Nigerians.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update