Connect with us

Opinion

Nigeria, the compromised Society

Published

on

By Jibrin Samuel Okutepa
Nigeria society seems to be a place where everything now appears to be compromised in favour of bad and corrupt practices. Nigerians are in hell in their own land. Those who worked hard to see that the right things are done are discouraged by decisions that support the continuation and approval of wrongs as rights. Nothing appears to be done to promote the greatest good of all in the governance and in decisions in judicial adjudications.

Justice appears polluted in favour of evil men in power and positions. The institutions that are supposed to protect us have left us to the whims and caprices of those who cheat us out of our rights. The pillars of justice appeared to have collapsed. Many have lost hopes. The ability to manipulate is required to be in the systems that need no manipulations. The judgment delivered today, the 27th day of May 2024, by the Kogi State Election Petition Tribunal
In petion No: EPT/KG/GOV/03/2023, YAKUBU MURTALA & ANOR. VS. INEC & 2 ORS clearly turned the law on its head. The Tribunal closed eyes to evidence and struggled to do what it did. It was pure judicial summersault in support of wrong processes.

The foundation for the collapse of justice was laid by those who have the responsibility to lay solid foundations for sustainable justice in legal processes. Justice suffers in the hands of those who are to serve it in the most undiluted form.Those who are trained to enforce the laws are doing it incorrectly and inconsistently and not within the letters and the spirits of the law. They closed eyes to injustice. They lament behind but lack the courage to do what is right.

We live in compromised systems.
The evil doers dictate everything that goes on in every department of the systems we operate. No system operates independently of interference. Those who do not want to compromise are living in agony and are daily agonizing. That is why democracy in Nigeria appears to be heading to catastrophic destruction.

Sovereignty does not belong to the people. It belongs to a few tiny cabals in and out of powers. We live in a completely compromised democratic corrupt system in Nigeria.There is nothing like the rule of law in Nigeria.
Justice has developed eyes and acquired sight to follow evils and to support and sustain them in Nigeria.

Nothing good will be seen and work in Nigeria until Nigerians collectively agree to do what is right and just. A just and egalitarian society can not be attained when truth and justice are compromised on the primordial partisan interests in judicial adjudications. Where cases are decided to support the subversion of democratic processes, anarchy is eminent.

No society can grow and develop when people are allowed to profit from their own wrongs and wickedness perpetuated in sabotage of law that was promulgated for the promotion of a just and fair process.
Society of compromises is a society destined for destruction.

It is a society where people are held accountable and punished for evil they do that can produce and promote enduring democratic legacy for the happiness of the vast majority of the people. Nigeria appears to be far from such an egalitarian society given the intolerable spirit of compromises by those who should not tolerate evils and violations of our laws.

By Jibrin Samuel

The purpose of law is to ensure orders and good behaviour. Those who interpreted the law upside down to achieve a predetermined outcome are enemies of a just society. But let me say that despite all these compromises, we must ensure that light is not overwhelmed by this darkness hovering in our land.

Calm down. We will not run away from practice. We will show light in darkness. One day and not too long, our light will outshine the darkness in the firmament of legal practice in Nigeria. Be calm. Congratulations to my colleagues on the wonderful legal team who displayed unparalleled legal dexterity despite all odds.

Jibrin Samuel Okutepa

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Edo guber dispute: APC breaks defence jinx, calls witnesses, PDP presses cancelled, ‘single vote’ over-voting

Published

on

PDP and APC logos

By Ehichioya Ezomon

The main proceedings of the Election Petitions Tribunal (EPT) – hearing the challenge to the election of Senator Monday Okpebholo as Governor of Edo State on September 21, 2024 – came to an end on Thursday, February 13, 2025, when the All Progressives Congress (APC), as the 3rd Respondent, closed its defence after calling four of pledged 28 witnesses in its two-day outing at the tribunal in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
However, the APC closure of its defence – coming in similar abrupt manner by the Petitioners (Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Dr Asue Ighodalo) on February 3; the 1st Respondent (Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)) on February 6; and the 2nd Respondent (Okpebholo) on February 10 – sparked instant recrimination between the Edo State chapters of the APC and PDP over alleged “witness sabotage” engineered within and/or outside the APC fold. 
While such fiercely-partisan bickerings are a routine between the ruling and main opposition parties in Edo State; several issues croped up on February 12, and February 13 when the APC opened and closed its defence at the tribunal.
One, the APC broke the near “no-show” jinx in the Respondents’ camp by calling four witnesses to testify for it. Two, the witnesses were Local Government Agents or Local Government Collation Agents for the APC. • Three, the witnesses admitted there’re over-voting in some polling units, many of which, they noted, were cancelled by INEC’s officials on poll day. 
Four, yet, PDP/Ighodalo have queried the same cancelled over-voting results in their petition
Five, most of the PDP/Ighodalo contested polling units recorded a single over-vote. How? • Six, by calling witnesses to testify for it, the APC may’ve brought both a sigh of relief and a cold comfort to the party members and supporters in Edo State, and the country at large.
Certainly, the APC’s defence brought a “sigh of relief” in that, for its members and supporters – many of them (like in the general public) ignorant of the intricacies of prosecuting election petitions – it’d been long nights in 16 days, since the hearing proper began on January 21 at the tribunal.
The party members and supporters have had to endure emotional torture, as they watched “edited clips” or read on social media how counsel and witnesses for PDP/Ighodalo took the INEC, Okpebholo and APC through the legal grinding mill at the proceedings, first in Benin City, Edo State capital city, and then in Abuja.
The APC’s also given members and supporters “cold comfort” because, besides having no illusions about the PDP/Ighodalo petition against the election of Okpebholo as Governor, they’re not as optimistic about the tribunal outcome as the Acting Chairman of the Edo APC, Emperor Jarrett Tenebe.
Reacting to the Plaintiffs closing their petition on February 3, after calling 19 of the hundreds of witnesses earmarked to testify for them, Tenebe told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that PDP/Ighodalo “abandoned their case abruptly because they have no case ab initio,” boasting that when the Respondents opened their case, “the whole country and the people of Edo in particular would know that the APC won the election.” 
Tenebe appeared hasty to criticise PDP/Ighodalo, as the INEC, through Kanu Agabi (SAN), on January 6, closed its defence without calling any witness, thus giving PDP an opening to offer “expert opinion” to the 1st Respondent, noting, “This abrupt end to INEC’s defence leaves the electoral body relying solely on cross-examinations and arguments from APC and Okpebholo’s lawyers.”
This was as Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN), for the Plaintiffs, told the tribunal, after Agabi’s request, that, “Frankly speaking, we are not surprised and it is well within the right of the 1st Respondent (INEC) to show such good discretion. We are not objecting.” 
At the resumed proceeding on February 6, Agabi told the tribunal that his team had shelved the idea of bringing witnesses after it reviewed the case, adding, “My Lords, after we left you yesterday (Wednesday), we gave more thought to the matter and came to the conclusion that the sensible thing to do is to close the case of the 1st Respondent, which we hereby do.”
The chairman of the three-man tribunal, Justice Wilfred Kpochi (with Justices A.B. Yusuf and A.A. Adewole) in the petition marked, EPT/ED/GOV/02/2024, then ruled: “The request (by INEC via Agabi) is granted and the first Respondent’s case is hereby closed,” and adjourned to February 10, for Okpebholo to open his defence, which he did by calling one witness, and closing his case.
Among a plethora of alleged electoral infractions, the three-man tribunal of Justices Wilfred Kpochi (Chairman), A.B. Yusuf and A.A. Adewole, in the petition marked, EPT/ED/GOV/02/2024, is looking mainly into irregularities of over-voting, non-serialisation of electoral materials, incorrect computation of the total number of votes cast in many polling units, which reportedly exceeded accredited voter-count recorded by the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) that the INEC deployed for the ballot.
The Plaintiffs’ witnesses (19 of them) and counsel had honed in on those alleged poll indiscretions, to prove that the 291,667 votes (about 51.1%) credited to Okpebholo (APC, Edo Central) as winner of the election, and 247,274 votes (about 43.3%) scored for Ighodalo, a Lagos-based Lawyer and business tycoon, were “manufactured” by the INEC, APC and Police to favour Okpebholo.
In their testimonies, the witnesses attempted to demonstrate alleged suppression, inflation and alteration of votes to the detriment of Ighodalo, pointing out votes that should’ve been counted or cancelled, and claiming that INEC’s rigging of the process amounts to a serious breach of the Electoral Act 2022 (as amended).
With the reported “brilliant performances” by PDP/Ighodalo’s witnesses and legal teams bolstering the Plaintiffs’ claims of massive fraud at the poll they said Ighodalo won, and should be declared as Governor of Edo State; the APC members and supporters were hopeful that the Respondents would match the Plaintiffs’ submissions. 
But when it’s turn to open defence on Thursday, February 6, the INEC (Ist Respondent) closed the case without calling any of the five witnesses it’d insisted the previous day (February 5) would testify for it. 
Blindsided by INEC’s counsel, Agabi’s closure of the case, counsel to Okpebholo (2nd Respondent), Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), prayed for adjournment to Monday, February 10, to enable him “move the five witnesses” to be called from Benin City to Abuja, with Justice Kpochi acceding and adjourning sitting to February 10. 
But when the hearing resumed, Okpebholo called only one witness, Majek Osumah, an APC polling agent from Ward 7, Unit 4, Ovia Southwest Local Government, who testified that the election was conducted peacefully, but that the result was cancelled due to over-voting, and that in Form EC8B, the column for the result of his Unit 4 had no record.
Against the foregoing, the APC members’ and supporters’ worries and anxieties increased, as the 3rd Respondent opened its defence on Wednesday, February 12, which, to its (APC’) credit, broke the “defence jinx,” and called four witnesses.
They witnesses include: Afuda Theophilus Idemudia, 54, a businessman resident in Benin City, who monitored the poll in Esan North East Local Government Area; Kamarudeen Coker Bello, 54 years, a businessman, lives in Igarra, and served as a Local Government agent of the APC in Akoko-Edo LGA; Engr. Gabriel Iduseri, APC’s Collation Agent for Oredo LGA; and Hon. Frank David, APC’s Collation Agent for Owan West LGA, all of whose testimonies, reported by The Nation on February 12, are run below with some abridgements:
“Led in evidence by Echezona Etiaba (SAN), the first witness, Afuda Theophilus Idemudia, told the tribunal that the result of the poll from the Esan North East LGA was signed by the agent of the PDP.
“He confirmed that under Exhibit PCB-40, titled: Ballot Paper and Verification Statement, the Part A of the document was expected to be completed by an official of INEC before the opening of poll, while Part B was to be completed after the close of election.
“When handed a copy of the documents to confirm, the witness, said: ‘Yes, I can see serial numbers recorded on this document. They are: 0459785 and 0460292,’  maintaining that serial numbers of Ballot Papers issued to the respective polling units were filled.
“Under cross-examination by a lawyer to the petitioners, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), the witness confirmed that the number of accredited voters in Unit 11, Ward 6, was 96, and upon Owonikoko’s request, the witness calculated the votes to be 97, with APC getting 53 votes, PDP 43 votes, and one rejected vote.
“The second witness, Kamarudeen Coker Bello, who admitted his signed statement on November 9, 2024, and adopted it while being led by Etiaba, confirmed, nder cross-examination by Owonikoko, that the petitioners raised allegations of over-voting in 17 polling units in Akoko-Edo LGA. 
“The third witness, Engr. Gabriel Iduseri, claimed that there was no complaint about the conduct of the election by agents of the parties that participated in the contest in Oredo LGA, even as he he admitted that the result from polling unit 8, Ward 10, was cancelled at the Ward Collation Centre due to over-voting; and that it’s the responsibility of electoral officers to confirm the correctness or otherwise of results submitted at the LGA level.
“Asked if he was aware there was a table of 53 and 66 polling units in Oredo LGA, where petitioners alleged that INEC recorded the results incorrectly, the witness said though he read the petition, he could not recall the number of the disputed polling units.
“The fourth witness, Hon. Frank David, said that INEC officials diligently collated all results from the polling units in Owan West LGA, and none of agents queried the final result, adding that he, the PDP and Labour Party (LP) agents signed the result sheets of the election.
“Cross-examined, David said he was aware that INEC officials ought to fill details of sensitive materials handed to them for the poll, but he could not confirm if the procedure was followed since he did not serve as an official of INEC during the election.
“Handed the IReV report of Form EC8A of Ward 4 Unit 19, the witness confirmed that although only 36 persons were accredited, votes recorded for the unit were: 28, 1 and 8, amounting to 37, indicating one over-vote.
“While he confirmed that the exhibit containing the votes from Ward 8, Unit 8, were: 54 and 25, totaling 79, with 1 marked as rejected vote, making it a total of 80 votes; the witness claimed the results from Unit 5 were cancelled owing to over-voting.”
Thereafter, lead counsel to the APC, Emmanuel Ukala (SAN), announced that his client was preparing a schedule of documents to tender when the proceedings resume, and the tribunal adjourned till February 13, when the APC closed its defence without calling any of the pledged 24 additional witnesses.
Explaining the decision to close the defence, counsel to APC expressed confidence in the unimpeachable legal defence mounted for the poll victory of Governor Okpebholo. So, Ferdinard Orbih (SAN) addressed the tribunal, as reported by award-winning journalist from Edo State, Mr Sebastine Ebhuomhan, as follows:
“Yesterday (Wednesday, February 13), we promised that we will exchange our schedule of documents today in order to make for a seamless presentation of our witness testimony. My Lord, I am sorry to say the documents we were expecting did not arrive. 
“However, we have done a further comprehensive review of the evidence led by the petitioners, the evidence received from the petitioners under cross-examination, the evidence led so far by the respondents in this tribunal, the documentary evidence before this tribunal… 
“My Lord, we have also considered that time is of (the) essence. The judicial time of this honourable tribunal is precious. My Lord, taking all the enumerated factors into serious consideration, we are happy at this stage to close the 3rd respondent’s case as it pleases Your Lordship.”
Responding to the application to close their case, Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN) for the Plaintiffs, highlighted, with a jab, the surprising “abandonment” of the 3rd Respondent’s scheduled 28 witnesses after calling just four of the witnesses.
“My learned counsel has just addressed the court. I’m actually not quite sure about the state of those documents. I can only say ‘he who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day.’ So, we have no objection,” Oyeyipo said.
Even with no objection from the other Respondents (INEC and Okpebholo), Orbih replied Oyeyipo’s poking, thus: “My Lord, I’m still on the point of fact. When they (Plaintiffs) scheduled 99 witnesses and presented only 19, we didn’t accuse them of running away. They have no business with how we conduct our case. We remain here. We are not running away.”
Despite pleadings by the Respondents and Plaintiffs for more days to prepare their written addresses, Justice Kpochi stood his ground and closed the defence of the 3rd Respondent (APC), and acceded to seven days for the Respondents, five days for the Petitioners and extra three days to file their final written addresses, which counting began on Friday, February 14, and adjourned the tribunal to Monday, March 3, for the adoption of the written addresses.
Going forward, the battle of wits between PDP/Ighodalo (Petitioners) and APC/Okpebholo (Respondents) for the Governorship, and political soul of Edo State continues in the next 13 days till the March 3!

Mr Ezomon, Journalist and Media Consultant, writes from Lagos, Nigeria. Can be reached on X, Threads, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp @EhichioyaEzomon. Tel: 08033078357

Continue Reading

Opinion

N96bn LG Fraud: Nazi Obaseki and Fellow Treasury Looters Have Murdered Sleep in Edo State

Published

on

Godwin Obaseki

By Fred Itua

Governance at the grassroots level is the most fundamental pillar of democracy. When local government councils, which are closest to the people, fail in their responsibilities, the impact is felt directly by citizens through stalled development, poor infrastructure, and diminished public trust. This is why the recent report of the Investigative Panel on Local Government Finances in Edo State is not just another document; it is a call to action.

The decision to set up the Investigative Panel was not arbitrary; it was necessitated by growing concerns over financial mismanagement across the 18 Local Government Councils. The alarming lack of visible developmental projects, despite substantial allocations, raised critical questions that demanded answers. It was in response to these concerns that the government, committed to transparency and accountability, constituted the panel to conduct a thorough investigation into the financial activities of the councils.

With a mandate to examine revenue inflows, expenditure patterns, and the overall financial integrity of the councils, the panel embarked on a meticulous process, employing forensic analysis, document reviews, and interviews with key stakeholders. Although some challenges were encountered, including late and incomplete financial records, the panel was still able to piece together a revealing and deeply troubling picture.

The panel’s findings are damning. Over ₦95 billion accrued to the councils between September 4, 2023, and the present, yet very few meaningful projects were executed. Instead, the panel uncovered widespread financial recklessness, including:

1. Diversion of Public Funds – The sum of ₦10.4 billion was funneled into an ALGON (Association of Local Governments of Nigeria) account under the guise of “Security, Trainings.” This account, rather than serving the public, became a conduit for siphoning government resources, with funds being transferred to private individuals and companies.

2. Dubious Transactions Through Private Entities – The report identified corporate beneficiaries such as Rokuosa Enterprise (₦3.4 billion), Demarriots Hotels Limited (₦1.07 billion)—a hotel owned by the impeached Orhionmwon Local Government Chairman—and Kezmith Global Ventures (₦2.01 billion). These funds, meant for local government development, were instead funneled into private hands.

3. Unjustifiable Withdrawals from Local Government Accounts – The report details over ₦5.1 billion in suspicious withdrawals across various councils, with notable individuals pocketing significant sums. For instance, Ahonsi Ogieegbaen Osifo withdrew over ₦556 million across multiple councils, while others, like Eric Agbonmwanre (₦394 million) and Abraham Burma (₦337 million), also benefited from this financial hemorrhage.

4. Obstruction of Investigations – The panel also faced deliberate attempts to hinder its work, with council personnel failing to provide timely records and later attempting to influence the process through unethical means.

The revelations in this report are not just numbers on paper—they represent stolen opportunities for development, broken trust in leadership, and a blatant disregard for the welfare of the people. To allow these findings to be swept under the carpet would be a gross injustice to the citizens who depend on local governments for basic amenities and services.

Governor Monday Okpebholo-led administration will take decisive action.

1. Full Implementation of Sanctions – Those implicated in financial mismanagement will face legal consequences. Public officials should be held to account, and no political cover will be provided to shield the guilty.

2. Recovery of Stolen Funds – Every kobo illegally taken from the public treasury will be traced and recovered. The government will work with financial institutions, the EFCC, and other anti-corruption agencies to retrieve misappropriated funds.

3. Strengthening Financial Oversight – This report has exposed weaknesses in the system that is being urgently addressed by the Okpebholo administration. There will be stricter monitoring of local government accounts, mandatory public disclosures of budgets and expenditures, and independent auditing mechanisms to prevent future abuses.

4. Prosecution and Deterrence – It is not enough to simply remove corrupt officials; they must face legal consequences. Governor Okpebholo is sending a strong message that corruption at the grassroots level will no longer be tolerated.

This investigative report will not gather dust in government archives. It will serve as a turning point for local governance in Edo State. The government has taken a bold step by uncovering these irregularities, but it will further show its commitment to accountability in its resolve to act on these findings. Implementing the recommendations to the letter is not just an administrative necessity by the Okpebholo administration —it is a moral obligation to the people, and Governor Okpebholo is ready to act fast.

The grassroots deserve better. The people deserve accountability. For Godwin Obaseki, PDP public funds looters and impeached local government chairmen, their sun will set at noon.

Fred Itua is the Chief Press Secretary to Edo State Governor.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Mallam Nuhu Ribadu’s Undiplomatic Tirade: An Embarrassment to Nigeria’s Foreign Relations

Published

on

Lemmy Ughegbe

Mallam Nuhu Ribadu’s recent undiplomatic outburst regarding Canada’s visa denial to General Christopher Musa and half of his team represents a serious diplomatic blunder for Nigeria. Publicly telling Canada “go to hell” is reckless and deeply embarrassing; a country should conduct international relations with decorum and strategic maturity.

It’s key to remember that General Musa’s trip to Canada was to attend an invited ceremony honoring war veterans. General Musa also stated that half of his team had been issued event visas. The key question is: Why did the other half get refused entry? Rather than seeking clarification through diplomacy, Ribadu’s inflammatory statement harmed Nigeria’s international reputation.

Although inconvenient, visa denials are commonplace and not exclusive to Nigeria. Each country, Canada included, controls its borders, deciding who can enter based on immigration laws, security, and diplomacy. Nigeria, too, exercises this right when necessary. Such vitriol from a senior national security official is undignified and shows a poor grasp of global diplomacy.

Moreover, Ribadu is not the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Given his role as National Security Adviser, he should have contacted the Foreign Affairs Minister to seek diplomatic solutions. Assuming both NSA and Foreign Affairs Minister roles unilaterally undermines diplomatic protocols and portrays the government as immature, untrained, and unfit for diplomacy, which he cannot do. His outburst reveals poor strategic thinking and questions his fitness for the job.

Engaging Canada diplomatically, seeking clarification on their denial and advocating for reconsideration, would have been a more measured and calculated response. Tact, not childish tantrums, is required for diplomatic engagements. Ribadu’s actions suggest a sense of entitlement, implying Nigeria deserves visas from all countries. This is not realistic. High-ranking officials are not exempt from the host country’s entry requirements.

In addition, that reaction might damage the bilateral ties between Nigeria and Canada. Canada is a key partner for Nigeria, especially in trade, development aid, and education. Canada’s support has spanned various sectors, including security cooperation, over the years. Severing diplomatic ties due to a visa rejection is unwise and shortsighted. Nigeria must avoid impulsive responses that could harm its global standing.

Ironically, Ribadu’s outburst exposes a core problem in Nigerian governance: prioritizing privilege over responsibility. Rather than reflecting on the delegation’s rejection, he chose to use inflammatory language. Did security concerns, the delegation’s purpose, or other undisclosed factors cause Canada to have issues? A competent national security advisor would investigate these questions instead of resorting to childish insults.

Nigerian officials need a wake-up call; this incident highlights the need for better international diplomacy. Diplomatic language is useful because it encourages productive discussions and respects all nations involved, even when there is conflict. Nigeria’s reckless handling of foreign relations will only deepen its international isolation.

Nigeria deserves an apology from Mallam Nuhu Ribadu for his reckless comment. His responsibility extends beyond himself; he speaks for a nation exceeding 200 million. Restraint, maturity, and strategic thinking are vital for leadership, all of which were absent from his undiplomatic rant. Nigeria needs to ensure its leaders act with decorum to earn international respect.

Lemmy Ughegbe, Ph.D writes from Abuja

Email: lemmyughegbeofficial@gmail.com

WhatsApp ONLY: +2348069716645

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 National Update